OSW: Yafi vs NA

Status
Not open for further replies.
_____The__Dude_____ said:
A well written reply black-dragon Allies do serve a purpose, and throughout history the weak have allied with the strong for survival. The strong in turn use the weak as pawns.

Sub clans have nothing to do with alliances. Nor do family clans. Clan expansion necessitates a need for other clans to hold members.

The strong don't look for alliances, the weak do. The strong accept alliances, as another resource at their disposal. It's pretty clear who is the weak and the strong in the Zaft/Yafi alliance.

You either have a limited knowledge of history, or you're ignoring a large part of it in order to validate your assertion. Sun Tzu didn't write that yesterday. Strong nations have sought allies throughout history, and still do today. The Cold War is a prime example. The two dominant powers on the planet actively sought out allies that were weaker than themselves for decades.

The reference to sub clans wasn't about alliances per se. I mentioned them in order to illustrate how clans have evolved on KaW in addition to forming alliances.

As for strong and weak, it's pretty clear that NA has been expending a lot of effort in the forum to make a case, but I know better. And I'm not going to get into a pointless debate about it. This isn't my first rodeo. I'll just let the amount of effort you're putting into propaganda speak for itself.
 
Wow, a great first post and then that drivel. Disappointing black-dragon, I expected more. Seeing as how you can refute nothing I've said, and think stronger powers accepting alliances with weaker powers somehow negates what I've said, it's clear you are out of your element.
 
_____The__Dude_____ said:
Wow, a great first post and then that drivel. Disappointing black-dragon, I expected more. Seeing as how you can refute nothing I've said, and think stronger powers accepting alliances with weaker powers somehow negates what I've said, it's clear you are out of your element.

Actually, I refuted what you said and provided an example, the Cold War.

The USA and the USSR didn't just accept alliances with smaller nations. They actively sought them out and sometimes even competed for them. It's a fact. If it negates what you've said, that's not my problem. Learn more about history.
 
lIlIlDIlIlIElIlIlAlIlIlDIlIlI said:
Ya__Grom__fi (dead)
__judgment__ (dead)
Ya__judgment__fi (dead)
Ya__riseofhonour__fi (hte and rotwb only check history)
You ask for it (eb only check history
here's another great NA forum posting lying strategy!

Just post that all your opponents are dead or inactive!!!

You sure know how to make our day hahaha
 
llilFlliRiliElllEiilZillEiiil said:
Joberhi said:
You say we have 1.5 clans or 3 clans... He says 5. Is their some miscommunication in New Age for who they are warring. This shows how much they stretch the truth.
Lots of miscommunications within New Age

Sometime ago, Twicc said:
TwiccJr said:
On a serious note,

NA won't touch LOS members who will leave, we did cf with you, we only doing this osw against YAFI and BAlle

NewAgeMonkey posted on my wall
You guys said the old war was done. Not us. Our war with LOS never ended. You guys just jumped in

Their own members don't even know what is happening.
let's reiterate this

NA members don't even know what war they are fighting

So much so for a legendary clan
 
Black-Dragon said:
_____The__Dude_____ said:
Wow, a great first post and then that drivel. Disappointing black-dragon, I expected more. Seeing as how you can refute nothing I've said, and think stronger powers accepting alliances with weaker powers somehow negates what I've said, it's clear you are out of your element.

Actually, I refuted what you said and provided an example, the Cold War.

The USA and the USSR didn't just accept alliances with smaller nations. They actively sought them out and sometimes even competed for them. It's a fact. If it negates what you've said, that's not my problem. Learn more about history.

The difference, which you may not understand, is in a real war, alliances are based on more than just "strong" and "weak". In your example, alliances were sought, and some still maintained to this day for strategic reasons. Natural resources (oil), strategic positioning (USSR and Cuba), among other things not relevant to kaw. The strong made these alliances with the weak for something the weak had, in return for protection. So no, that negates zero of what I said. But hey, nice try.

Better get back to your history lessons, they are carrying over great into this phone app.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top