Re: Why not both? (Clan Wars and Individual Wars) Kage. Great idea, fully support. Like many of the best ideas it's so obvious / simple.
Re: Why not both? (Clan Wars and Individual Wars) Thank you all for the support and feedback. Let's hope the devs like the idea. Cheers, Kage.
Re: Why not both? (Clan Wars and Individual Wars) Kage you are full of it. And by "it" I mean good ideas. Full support. I miss warring with my silver people
Re: Why not both? (Clan Wars and Individual Wars) Support. As already stated keeps people from running up rancor to fast but lets everyone get to play
Re: Why not both? (Clan Wars and Individual Wars) Did anyone else read the title to that taco shell commercial?
Re: Why not both? (Clan Wars and Individual Wars) @ cloud- I said the bottom 5 must be able to hit the top five. Very few clans can cast 5 sh with 7 trill in allies, war in and war out. Maybe one or two, but 5? It will greatly reduce stacking, especially since those big sh are very strip-able, should a clan try that repeatedly.
Re: Why not both? (Clan Wars and Individual Wars) Clan wars are great, way to many noobs that know nothing and can't follow simple directions in individual wars. Say maybe 1 a week and 1 a weekend in each time slot is prefect
Re: Why not both? (Clan Wars and Individual Wars) I still think the devs should schedule both at the same time. Let clans war together if they want to (and accpet the risks of clan war), or let individuals war if they can't or don't want to war with a clan. Everyone gets a chance to war -- with the known risks of both. Cheers, Kage.