~World Leaders~ PBP

Discussion in 'Activities' started by -IIXII-AJ-IIXII-, Sep 19, 2015.

  1. Let Canada fight US. It'll be like the reverse of Fallout's plot. Hopefully without the Wasteland part, but we'll see what happens.
    As for Russia, are any of us actually in a position to effectively resist them? Or help them?
     
  2. Let me defend myself before you vote, the U.S is unpredictable and has funded terrorists in the past, their people are poor and a lot of neighbourhoods could be considered third world territories

    If my occupation of the United States's is allowed i promise to improve the quality of life for every citizen of the United States.
     
  3. Istan withholds their vote and comments at this time.
     
  4. Our military is completely for self-defense, and if we provoke an offensive war, we will face the punishment. Yet, if you do not allow us to build aircraft carriers, or transport ships, how will we protect our allies? Would we just sit here and wait for the enemy to come to us? They would never need to combat us if they did, we would just be sitting here until a nation with a larger navy us able to take us down and defeat us.
     
  5. Developing, or have developed? If they're done, attacking will end with a bang either way. If it is in development, there's still time to raid and find it before it is completed.
     
  6. No. We either all cap Japan or we give them the right to build army if we all attack if they do something fishy
     
  7. No war at first but all trade with that country should be closed off and cut all Internet/ communications in that nation
     
  8. Japan has issued their statement, making a vote unnecessary.

    Last issue:

    Should there be an international force focusing on the Shudda!
     
  9. I don't mind you attacking someone as long as it's for the sole purpose of protecting your allies. :ugeek:
     
  10. That why I suggested a turn to fix it. Let's vote on capping Japan military or not and get details later
     
  11. International forces would clash I believe. Set up independent teams from each country, and have them report to a UN representative. Divide and conquer.
     
  12. Alright. Should Japan's military be capped for defense only? Yes or no.
     
  13. I do not feel am international force is required currently. If they become more active than yes but why go spend millions on trying find and destroy a needle in a hat stack. Let's help any country that has terrorist attacks. I feel an international force would be counter productive compared to nations working together
     
  14. Istanians vote they have a capped, small, amount of offensive. Trust is earned.
     
  15. I think the special forces of each nation should co-operate but leave the avarage soldier out
     

  16. I agree
     
  17. I'll side with the Istanians on the Japan's military topic.
     
  18. I say PM so you don't ruin your standing with each other. 
     
  19. I feel it is necessary to increase security in regions with much terrorism. However, is an international force truly necessary. On the other hand, I suppose it would be naive to not consider them a massive threat.
     
  20. Regarding Shudda, Istan feels we are all very different people with different methods in doing things. Cooperating at this time would be counterproductive and that should be on hold at this time.