Alrighty. This has been debated in clan chat for long enough, im severly confused, and even more clueless than before the conversation. The situation: In eb's when some players only attack, their end of eb bonuses are huge, in comparison to those of us who use both spies and troops. Eg - 75 actions, 3b total plunder. 95 actions, 3.85b. While I understand here that items for these players have very large effects on the bonuses, especially as they are getting lots (damn you iPh 5), but if theyre not getting items in every eb and still getting these crazy bonuses, then we laymen of the clan figured that there must be something about only using attacks that means the plunder is crazy. I do also realize that the size of these players also plays a part, but that is also part of my confusion. A player larger than the ones used in the example above, gets 3b total plunder for 126 actions. I have no idea if that theory is even true, but its all I have to go on at this point. Can anyone shed some light about this? Or am I not missing anything at all?
We have been doing so extensively as of late, and have still to reach a conclusion. The data just shows the exact same thing over and over.
All are attack builds in this particular case. All builds mentioned in the example have low spy, with high attack stats.
@senorita, the plunder algorithm is so complex and extremely confusing. It would take tons of rigorous testing to figure it out. Plunder also uses many variables that are impossible to test correctly. It is something I think will be left unsolved.
Could someone post on wc for me to get vollied? I lost my old account and so I am starting all over from scratch, thanks.