Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc) History shows the strong become weak over time because power corrupts. Zaft has ruled, dominated and abused Kawland for quite some time and you have to give them props for that. But the principles that made them great eventually became distorted. Other alliances who were oppressed time and again became stronger and have challenged Zaft over and over again but failed, thus creating stronger alliances that mirror a modern day rebellion against tyrants. Actions of Zaft made APOC stronger and it appears there will be a new power in KAW. I give props to APOC for that. Why it started, who cares really. Both sides have legendary players and lots of history in their respective camps. Both families protect each other, both hire/hit, both sides have been merciless. It's good for change or this game would be stagnant. Order overall is kept intact by checks and balances. Things are out of balance and will be restored by a new victor. Neither are right, neither are wrong if they stand up for what they believe in. I for one, get a kick of out of the butthurt, cries of foul play, vague screen shots, partial pm's, scared statless alts and trash talk pertaining to OSW. The announcement of the OMETs by far has been a great thread and toilet time read. If people are afraid of getting stripped and losing their investments, then I'd say your priorities are whack. Use your nob and crystal funds to help your families, start a savings account, buy stocks/bonds or anything you get a Return on your Investment. For those warring and enjoying, right on. It's a game people. So much emotion over a thumb hitting smart phone app. Choose a side, join the fight, or relax and enjoy the great trash talk and antics that come from great OSW's. As to what will APOC reign will be like? Probably just like every other power that has come and gone, I don't lose sleep over it. Their family of clans are all different and unique, just like Zafts. One thing they all have in common are their chosen family ties and they both war on a war based game. It's the leadership that makes the difference between being mediocre or great and how far each will go to protect their own. Hopefully this thread can stay on topic and become memorable as it should be. Other than that I eagerly anticipate each days read during my bathroom break. ️
Re: 300+T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc) There was no run around, I answered your questions and you tried to twist words, and the fact that you're resorting to name calling speaks volumes about you and what you're trying to do here. Now please, unless you have something relevant to the osw that I'm actually participating in, stop posting nonsense.
Re: 300+T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc) Erm I'm confused by that point, there were about 10 players with more allies than Harb ( actually don't know the exact number so don't quote me) are you suggesting they should've been stripped for Harbs behaviour? I mean if you want to be really pedantic about it would you prefer i amended the wording to ' even those who think they're beyond being stripped will now think otherwise ?' Glad I cleared that up, Plz feel free to follow me if there's anything else you want to ask JB
Re: 300+T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc) Well said Kaskade. No JB you've been helpful enough . Good Luck all involved in OSW and may KaW have better days ahead for all of you.
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc) Sometimes they do and sometimes they don't. If you're backed up by a powerful alliance they usually don't. It doesn't take a whole lot of bravery to trash talk or farm someone when you're backed up by 15 or 20 clans. Maybe if Apoc didn't act like thugs and threaten anyone and everyone who doesn't agree with them people wouldn't feel the need to post with statless alts to express their opinions. I'm not sure what bravery has to do with the value of an opinion anyway. I've known really smart cowards and really brave fools. I'll pick smart over foolish every time.
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc) Yes Joe this is true .Though I am not statless to hide my identity or protect a main (even posted name of lost acct) but was called a liar. told I wasn't relivant. even called a coward by 3 different members of this alliance. Really hope that this isn't a glimps into the days ahead for KaW
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc) Well you certainly win the award for most dramatic statless alt
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc) Erm wut ? You know that trash talking and having an opinion is different right ? I'm not apoc or Zaft and I've posted here and I haven't got one inc but then again I haven't trash talked about any of them. Also if you don't know what bravery has to do with the value of an opinion then you've never watched the world news, people give up everything to be able to voice their opinion so you truly haven't a clue. Then again you did use the term smart cowards lolz
Re: 300+T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc) I'll suggest that you didn't touch Red or Cella even though they've hire hit your members too. And you won't either until the war is over. Then it will be a different matter. I don't think people fully understand what's coming for KaW if Apoc wins. Taking out ZAFT will only be the beginning. Next will be dominating KaW and moving Apoc players up the leader board. Ive already heard IMF is impatient to start moving up to the top ten not to mention get some revenge on people who pounded on him in the past.
Re: 300+T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc) :lol: I love it. There are such a thing as KaW conspiracy theorists.
Re: 300+T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc) You are easily confused I see. Ego is how one thinks about ones self right? This has nothing to do with that. We are part of a game, our object of the game is to dominate, that takes (virtual) persistence and tenacity along with defending our (virtual honor). It's unfortunate people like you think themselves so righteous yet are hypocrites for telling us we have no right to be. Keep up the good battle of words in a game of troops and spies, seems it's all you have. We will keep using both Pad my ego you definitely are clueless
Re: 300+T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc) Yes I did get confused for second with both you spout off ridiculous redirect that neither of you know anything about . Then you show up posting quotes of me correcting myself hrs later. YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY!!!!!! good job bud next time ill use the crayons so it wont take so long for you to figure out
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc) Hey idiot. I posted the post you directed at smoke which was meant for me apparently given the second post. Tell me again how I am off please. And what the hell. You just sit in these forums all day waiting to reply to every comment. Man that response was quick. What a winner. I posted hours later cause I was at work and don't sit in forums like you apparently do.
Re: 300+T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc) Joe_mama, are you an idiot? IMF is number 3 on the ally lb (the one that matters). Now will you statless irrelevant noobs leave and stop making yourselves look stupid please? You all obviously have nothing to do with this war and know nothing of either alliance.
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc) That's all they know how to do smoke. Can't blame them. When you have zero relevance in anything you are left with attempts like these to give some sense of accomplishment. I suppose I'll add in that everyone who doesn't give an answer they like are brainless troglodytes also. Watch where you drag those knuckles bro!!
Re: 300+T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc) Well dang you got me again on being statless and resorted yet again to name caliing :lol: Short fuse BRO? if so Blow up on me already :shock: :lol:
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc) As opposed to your own name calling? hmmm this argument is now as relevant as yours it seems. What makes your posts so much more righteous then ours? Sorry to disappoint, but I won't get mad over words or a game. Perhaps I should use more fad sayings like u mad brah? Also that was the first time I called you a name. Just seemed to fit. Sorry.