Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc)

Who says anything about needing all of them Ty?

After all the known allies are bought, the remainder appear on the front page.

It's not like all the allies were bought systematically. I got 7 xtals in before he was totally naked.
 
Re: 300+T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc)

MOnKeYKnOcKS said:
Super-Crimson_X_the_War-God said:
Wont there for Chongo, dont care for Chongo.

Was there for harb though. That was awesome.

Lol acct not large enough to hit Harb, obviously houses none of Harbs stripped allies.

But you were totally THERE man

You thinking im not large enough to hit harb dissapoints me. I thought you knew more about KaW then that.
 
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc)

-TROLL_MaCHiNE- said:
Who says anything about needing all of them Ty?

After all the known allies are bought, the remainder appear on the front page.

It's not like all the allies were bought systematically. I got 7 xtals in before he was totally naked.

I thought all Harb's allies were bought within 2min? According to mare anyway. That can only be possible if allies were assigned to buyers :)
 
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc)

Exactly TY. If ATA cared they would have sent a cease and desist letter and the website would have closed down.

After looking at the site, it seems some of the information has to come from INSIDE ATA. How else are they getting spy statistics? Is ATA selling that information and that's why the site hasn't had a lawsuit against it?

I've heard ATA say many times "spirit of the game" is why they have screwed customers over in the past. Yet they do nothing about this site?
 
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc)

@raving Russian

Considering there is no way to "win" this game, you are a complete moron.

Of course there were multiple buyers on the known allies to speed up the process, then after they were bought the buyers proceeded to clear the remainder.
 
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc)

Ty said:
I seem to recall, I think it was an mg member, recently posting he link to that website in world announcement and getting silenced for it. I personally have emailed the devs multiple times over it. YET the website is still there. Don't think the devs care. It also provides daily/weekly tracking stats, tracks allies, gets all allies names for a clan or account (including back pages) and gets an opponent ee roster filled out in no time. 300t allies would be a lot of back page. There's absolutely no way you could get all their names by searching, then get the gold required for a strip that size and there not be 20 new name allies there instead with a big ally trader such as Harb.

5 same posts is spam btw blazey. I think you're on 4 atm ask them again in 24 hours.

You emailed ATA. So? What are they supposed to do? It's not on THEIR website.
 
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc)

-TROLL_MaCHiNE- said:
@raving Russian

Considering there is no way to "win" this game, you are a complete moron.

Of course there were multiple buyers on the known allies to speed up the process, then after they were bought the buyers proceeded to clear the remainder.

Without cheating? U missed that I assume?

Not possible in 2 min with the number of allies Harb had. It would've been a mess, slow mess - few buyers buying same allies at the same time, unintentionally volleying them and wasting gold - just one of the problems u come across in a strip, unless allies are assigned.
 
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc)

lllRUSSIANllIllllSPYlll said:
-TROLL_MaCHiNE- said:
@raving Russian

Considering there is no way to "win" this game, you are a complete moron.

Of course there were multiple buyers on the known allies to speed up the process, then after they were bought the buyers proceeded to clear the remainder.

Without cheating? U missed that I assume?


Kaw is an online game with no way to "win". Multiplayer online games cannot be won.

Maybe you should rephrase your useless rhetorical question.
 
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc)

It's not info from inside ATA, it's something to do with force intercepting packets off the interwebz. Remember all the info on KaW is on the interwebz. That's what I was told anyway. I don't have a clue when it comes to the technical stuff
 
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc)

TERRA said:
"Cease and desist order" you people must be kidding

The website is making an income off of ATA's information, using copyrighted pictures, and obviously has access inside of ATA servers.

Any judge would quickly issue a cease and desist order.

Not sure if you know about ATA's legal problems, but positively they already have legal council on tap and would merely have to request it.

Which leads me to believe ATA is allowing and condoning this.
 
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc)

IIllV-----VAL-3N7iN3-----VlIll said:
It's not info from inside ATA, it's something to do with force intercepting packets off the interwebz. Remember all the info on KaW is on the interwebz. That's what I was told anyway. I don't have a clue when it comes to the technical stuff

No bro ATA is totally like "here's the game code plz make a backdoor ally finder program"
 
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc)

TERRA said:
Ty said:
I seem to recall, I think it was an mg member, recently posting he link to that website in world announcement and getting silenced for it. I personally have emailed the devs multiple times over it. YET the website is still there. Don't think the devs care. It also provides daily/weekly tracking stats, tracks allies, gets all allies names for a clan or account (including back pages) and gets an opponent ee roster filled out in no time. 300t allies would be a lot of back page. There's absolutely no way you could get all their names by searching, then get the gold required for a strip that size and there not be 20 new name allies there instead with a big ally trader such as Harb.

5 same posts is spam btw blazey. I think you're on 4 atm ask them again in 24 hours.

You emailed ATA. So? What are they supposed to do? It's not on THEIR website.

Such website could be taken down in no time, just ask any attorney
 
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc)

MOnKeYKnOcKS said:
TERRA said:
"Cease and desist order" you people must be kidding

The website is making an income off of ATA's information, using copyrighted pictures, and obviously has access inside of ATA servers.

Any judge would quickly issue a cease and desist order.

Not sure if you know about ATA's legal problems, but positively they already have legal council on tap and would merely have to request it.

Which leads me to believe ATA is allowing and condoning this.

Allowing and condoning? Or don't care?? Lawyers cost money and ATA likes money.
 
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc)

-TROLL_MaCHiNE- said:
lllRUSSIANllIllllSPYlll said:
-TROLL_MaCHiNE- said:
@raving Russian

Considering there is no way to "win" this game, you are a complete moron.

Of course there were multiple buyers on the known allies to speed up the process, then after they were bought the buyers proceeded to clear the remainder.

Without cheating? U missed that I assume?


Kaw is an online game with no way to "win". Multiplayer online games cannot be won.

Maybe you should rephrase your useless rhetorical question.

Sorry I missed 'in'. Is there a way to win in this game without cheating? And if u say that's a rhetorical question also, then u need to explain that to ur nubs who claim victory over Zaft already. Are they complete morons in ur book too?
 
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc)

There is a difference between "winning" a game and "winning" in a war in a game.

I feel like I'm talking to a retarded wall.
 
Re: 300 T on Harb. (Zaft Carnage vs. Apoc)

TERRA said:
MOnKeYKnOcKS said:
TERRA said:
"Cease and desist order" you people must be kidding

The website is making an income off of ATA's information, using copyrighted pictures, and obviously has access inside of ATA servers.

Any judge would quickly issue a cease and desist order.

Not sure if you know about ATA's legal problems, but positively they already have legal council on tap and would merely have to request it.

Which leads me to believe ATA is allowing and condoning this.

Allowing and condoning? Or don't care?? Lawyers cost money and ATA likes money.

Lawyers don't cost money when you win a case. Losing side pays lawyer fee's in a case like this. ATA also has lawyers on retainer for situations JUST LIKE THIS.

You are aware ATA is/was being sued over patent infringement correct? They have lawyers already on retainer.

Also, customers of ATA pay ATA large sums of money to ensure a fair playing field. ATA themselves spout off "spirit of the game" propaganda all the time.

Bottom like, Customers pay ATA to file lawsuits exactly like this, to protect the investment they have spent on ATA's game. It's ATA's responsibility to ensure things like this doesn't happen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top