-Septentrio-
Well-Known Member
Here's a rather more tragic thought
The British army at the start of WW2 was in a worse condition than the start of WW1. Had been starved of money until the last years lacked equipment much of what it did have was WW1 vintage. The professional core of the old army had been shattered by the war and the peace.
Having invented the tank they had ignored its development and even more tragically after the leaps made at coordinating the armies battlefield tactics in WW1 they never sought the most effective ways to deploy the new equipment that they had.
Start of WW2 German armies and equipment wasn't massively superior to the French and British equivalents in quantity or quality.
It's use and deployment however was unparalleled in its expertise and coordination on the battlefield and the strategic theatre.
The British army at the start of WW2 was in a worse condition than the start of WW1. Had been starved of money until the last years lacked equipment much of what it did have was WW1 vintage. The professional core of the old army had been shattered by the war and the peace.
Having invented the tank they had ignored its development and even more tragically after the leaps made at coordinating the armies battlefield tactics in WW1 they never sought the most effective ways to deploy the new equipment that they had.
Start of WW2 German armies and equipment wasn't massively superior to the French and British equivalents in quantity or quality.
It's use and deployment however was unparalleled in its expertise and coordination on the battlefield and the strategic theatre.