im not seeing how gh are the issue it adds a lil spice to the game if no gh then people will complain of hansels or a dif build I dont think devs will be taking anything away from gh they spend to much on xtals to get equipment plus how do u think people are going to react after spending a couple hund bucks to put a nice lil gh together for season 2 then have devs say oh ya u cant use gh in season 2 one week before s2 starts I dont think that will go over well
If an odd number of clans have signed, why remove the last clan straight away??? The last clan that signed might create a more suitable match up with another clan than other clans that signed up before it. Shouldn't the clan that misses out be the clan that would cause the biggest miss-match for their group???
Also I must say if CS, BFE and BFA all get taken into consideration for these recent wars, then why do we still manage to get match up with clans who have 100-140mil more CS than us and massive BFA compared to us, and our only similar stats with our opponents is our BFE?
I still think dtw/dts is a joke like mentioned cause if theres a small handfull of bigs those bigs still dominate 98% of the battle field from what ive exp anyway dts/dtw would need to be a lot more limited to work like u would only be able to hit one above/below u and where would the fun be in that
@kaw_Admin- Please look at CS differences this weekend. In 2 hour wars, the larger CS clan has the advantage over bfa/bfe due to troops loss%. Hitting larger accts cause troops to deplete faster. Our clan, like others, will lower bfe to get more even CS matches. Which is counter-productive considering we all earned s1 equip and it now hurts us. Keep up the good work! Wars are closer now and that's awesome Thank you!
Big your statements clearly show that you do not understand the issue with ghs. No ppl would not then complain about other builds, because they all give fair balanced amts of plunder and are not looked at as an exploit that needs fixing. Please know what your talking about if your going to try and support something . "Spice" as u put it isnt stacking a few lbs with ghs so ur opponent had almost no chance to out plunder you. That is not anywhere near a realistic war strat, no where in war would the same # of players vs eachother should win with more than 2/3rds their roster being builds that no one earns anything on while they earn a high amt per hit. Yet are many times less stats then the others. There's no reason this should be rewarded or any reward for dropping ur stats. It is complete bs as of now with the plunder amount being so little.
Also you mentioned ppl spending money to build a gh. You're clearly missing the point. They will still have their ghs with high bfe and towers, but it they actually increased the plunder earned from them to anywhere near a fair amount I'd have no complaint, but clearly they haven't done that and until they do I see it as an exploit. If you do not see something wrong with that you do not understand war.
to hawk; I agree but hey its war right and in war we strive to be more advanced the more options complainers take out of the game the less intriguing it becomes im not going to take my lazer sights off my gun cause my opponent thinks lazers cause cancer and wont use them and yes I understand war completely and thats y I dont or wouldnt war with this build my clan has a lot of peeps that have made big corrections to try to get there foot in ee and have been doing so since a couple weeks before s1 ended it hate to see there hard work be for nothing
Complain, Complain, Complain! Here is a idea, instead of complaining in every war forum about all that is wrong, how about putting forward ideas to remedy your concerns... Oh that's right you don't have a clue, you just expect to click your fingers and it be perfect! Do you even understand how many variables the devs deal with every match up? A tweek fixes this but effects 3 other things. It wouldn't be impossible to have a flawless way system, unless devs made up our war clans up for us, each and every war, but who wants to war with randoms! News flash the devs are trying and should get a medal for their efforts and as for all you complainers, no one holds a sword to your chest and makes you cast a woc! So do the kawmunity a favour and build a bridge and get over it! Coz pointless complaining don't help anyone!
Actually people often give suggestions on how to improve the game but rarely do the devs actually listen even when a decent number of ppl post, and obviously theres more who don't post that feel the same way. There's a reason you see more people not happy about something that is clearly an issue.
First off thank you for being so active in this post ⭐... Maybe it's been said .. But the 25% hit ratio obviously is the wrong way to go it needs to be a 85-90% WIN ratio if 90% of either team can't WIN said attack who cares if it can go through or not winning a war has nothing to do with attacking for a loss .. I also agree with haTf1eLd's post for the most part .. I pay 2 xtals every war would it kill u to give xtals, gold ,nobs , mith, based on successful actions .. So even some on the losing side get rewarded for hard work .. As well as the winning side get hooked up .. Why not limit the amount of gh/lb per squad or just tier the wars also everyone in clan should b able to hit paladin eb (those not in war just get gold ) u want clan unity .. 1 hr set up 2 hr war 2 hr paladin eb 5hrs of inactivity is not very unifying .. Lastly .. Season 1 now trials for season 2 are almost complete .. So many posts and threads about people "cheating" or "gaming" the system or just doing shady **** .. Should b 1) warned 2)punished/suspended from ee 3) exposed for being the cheats they are .. Why not hold people accountable for the crap they constantly pull ? War on skill .. Plz get this right soon ...
Adding everyone's stats up and matching is the wrong way to go IMO. It leaves to much room for exploits. You can manipulate matches by stacking with smaller accounts for a favorable draw. I believe if they looked at each account for matchups or even look at similar size accounts to match. Like clan A has 2lb 4hlbc and 23 tower hansels. Clan b has 24 HLBC and 2 ILBC. Even though clan A has lower cs clan B doesn't stand a chance so IMO you should look to match off the individuals. Just like you don't want a team to have to much of a member advantage you shouldn't want them to have a lb advantage or even a tower hansel advantage.
I would hate to see them try and match individuals. It would take a really long time and they would have more no matches than matches under that system IMO. Also being able to get different builds to give you a favorable matchup is part of war. If the clans as a whole are close with all things factored in then most people would be fine with it. It is when you are having matchups so unbalanced you can overcome being down 5 accounts and not even have to use all your xtals to win that people are complaining about. The idea that losers should get more back is less than desirable for me. The Mith is fine and I agree a refund would be better than wasting time with paladins where the clan is punished for the loss. I don't think hit% is the way to get a good matchup and agree with the other 90 % that have said the same thing.
Theres 2 hrs prior to war plenty of time for proper match if better matches more clans will join giving even closer matches I think no match is better for the system at this point rather than getting pumbled or pumbling a unfair match
So the new way the game is working is kinda bad. The new formulas hurt. I'm 5mcs and I've been farmed for a week by someone about 12mcs that works? Right?