My point is that the central powers couldn't afford to continue the war as long as the allies. You could take away the rest of the allies and the British still could of won if they brought every fighting capable man from the empire to the war. The British controlled the seas and blockaded Germany which was having large effects on the war, the German navy was so scared of the British fleet that they mutinied rather than go into battle against the British. The allies could afford to lose millions upon millions of men on land, they could be replaced. The central powers didn't have that luxury. So Germany was destined to lose
In this case numbers didn't matter, Russia also failed their invasion in that war. They managed to put them in a long two-front war but even still they couldn't get it done. Can imagine if they hadn't failed in stoping that?
Don't get ahead of myself? Take away the allies and the battlefield wouldn't of been France. Now that I think about it the British would of dominated against Germany and their allies by themselves.
Yea but when you realise that if you take away the rest of the allies it wouldn't be a ground war. There would be no real battlefield. The war would go as such, sink the central power navies and then blockade them until they pursue peace. Simples
But back to the point, Germany was already doomed. The Ottomans and Austrians were collapsing, Germany couldn't prop them up any longer and would of been knocked out of the war by early 1919. Even with the German troops freed up from the Russian front, it doesn't match up to the troop lost from the ottoman and Austrians and the extra troops for the allies that would now be fully concentrated on the Germans. The Spring offensive also wouldn't of won Germany the war, the offensive had lost its momentum and even without the Americans, the allied lines would of held. Then in 1919 an allied plan for a massive mechanised assault against the Germans would of happened, it would of most likely knocked the Germans out of the war. Also, Germany was starving. You can't fight a war without food.
Lol it wouldn't be that simple, Germany not fighting a two-front war and all of their power focused on Britain would be very bad. The amount of casualties they would suffer would be massive. Also Germany's naval army ain't nothing scoffed at buddy, despite being outmaneuvered against Britain's ships their's did pretty well. Inflicting more damage on their ships I believe
I don't scoff at the German ww1 navy, I just know that it didn't stand a chance against the Royal Navy. Even the Germans knew that, it's why the sailors mutinied rather than sail to fight the British.
Also we can bring in world war 2 into this as well. No allies just Britain considering they were losing all both sides. Their improvements could have made them Britain surrender. But yea Germany had a less likely chance in the first war but I doubt Britain would win solely on their naval prowess in that war
Britain's naval prowess was a major contributor to success in both wars. In world war 1 the blockade starved the Germans and prevented them getting vital medical supplies that their population needed. In world war 2 if held the Germans at bay from invading the British mainland, and it wasn't just the future of Britain that was in the Royal Navy's hands at that moment, it was America's too. If Britain fell then America was also doomed.
So you would say Britain's Naval by themselves would beat Germany solely with their Naval in both wars? Maybe in the first and that's a BIG maybe. But the second, No way
you're the biggest hypocrite ever ...everything you're saying about USA in Vietnam pretty much applies to what you're saying about Germany in WW1 except according to you they won WW1 Loser you'ld be goose stepping eating Wiener schnitzel and your boyfriends name would be Hans if it wsnt for us pathetic loser
No that's not what I'm saying, I'm saying it was major contributor to both wars and in a scenario of ww1 Britain vs central powers by itself then it would be the main reason for a victory because ground conflicts would of been limited.
Fair enough, though ground forces wouldn't be that limited since that's Germany's strongest advantage. They would press hard if this happened
Cause in Vietnam it was diffrent it's a bit like fighting Isis now they don't quit , the Russians will quit eventually, if enough force is brought in