France also didn't have 2 million allies fighting alongside them and were outnumbered by the enemy. Common sense should tell you that the French would have more deaths than the Americans alone.
American forces were also outnumbered in certain battles. America's Aerial strikes are what did the damage
Weren't that different? 50k more troops isn't that much different? 50k troops is half of the standing full time military of a modern first rate military power like France and the UK. It is a massive difference in a war. The casualties weren't that different, all that does is insult America. 190,000 men took the same amount of deaths as 536,100 men had against the same size of an enemy. Not only that, but the combined French and allies army size was 400k, and inflicted 3 times more deaths against an enemy with significantly more troops than them. The American and allies size was like 2.5 million, they outnumbered the enemy by 5-6 to 1, had a much larger airforce than France did and they still couldn't achieve over double the amount of deaths on their enemy than they received.
Wha? So your French?? !! ...BAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Lame ass nazi appeasers French got their asses whooped in Nam French got booted out not USA you ass wipe we left pretty much on our own. You got chased out by Charlie. French havnt done crap since Napoean and he wasn't really even French
I'm not French, I'm British and usually I jab fun at the French but facts are facts, the French performance was superior to the American performance
LOLOL French suck butt since Napolean ..maybe you want to defend French policies in Africa for the past 50 years
In modern war it didnt matter, the first idochina war is really irrelevant to Vietnam war. The scale of that war shouldn't even be compared. Lets not for get their last battle in which the French got trashed. They were not fully equipped for the war, thats France fault.