US supreme court says no license is required

" Thompson v.Smith, 154 SE 579, 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135
"The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon,
in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy
life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the
right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing
modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate
an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business." -Thompson vs. Smith, supra.;

 

Fhttps://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/31

(6)Motor vehicle.—
The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.
(10)Used for commercial purposes.—
The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.

 

Your problem is you don't understand the difference between traveling / driving and motor vehicle / automobile

 

Ghttps://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/31

(6)Motor vehicle.—
The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.
(10)Used for commercial purposes.—
The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.

Now that I've shown you the legal definition of "motor vehicle" defined by the legislature as being for commercial use, what do you think the DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLE is licensing lol

 

driving is a privilege no argument there I've already said that driving is a job description, driver is a job title, taxi driver, bus driver, cattle driver, etc, etc, the issue is traveling on the road with your private car, that does not require a license because it's a common right of the people to exercise liberty without police interference as the supreme court has already upheld

 

Lol just admit that you fell for the cops bluff, your mom lied to you, your grandpa led to your mom, everyone wants to say I'm wrong but no one can produce anything to the contrary, please show me something, I've shown you reference from Cornell is a respectable law school, you seem to think they're rubbish, how about you look at the actual law instead of repeating what everyone thinks is common knowledge and has no basis in facts, show me the law bro, stop being a fool and show me where anyone is required to have permission to exercise a right

 

you are arguing that the supreme court is wrong, your arguing that driving is not commercial activity, you can not produce one fact, your like a parrot your so brainwashed, you have no thought that was not put there for some fraudulent reason, put your mom on the forum maybe she will show me the law of facts she relies on to require her to get a license

 

oh man by your logic all the roads are closed lol you did not read the article, there is no constitutional provision preventing use of the roads, roads were created back when everyone was using horses and buggies, and no license was required then either, then one day the car come out, everyone using cars and ripping up the roads delivering packages and cargo, so people got together and decided there should be a tax and a designation to determine who is using the road for commerce and who is not, oohhhhhhh how about we make everyone in commerce put a tag (license plate) on their car so we can tell they have paid the tax, and we will make them get a license for the privilege to use the roads for commerce, that way we can revoke their ability to do commerce of they don't follow the speed limit or rip up the roads

 

" People v. Horton
14 Cal. App. 3rd 667 (1971)
“The right to make use of an automobile as a vehicle of travel long the highways of the state, is no longer an open question. The owners thereof have the same rights in the roads and streets as the drivers of horses or those riding a bicycle or traveling in some other vehicle.”

 

You claim that all roads are only used for military, I don't see any of that, when I look out my window all I see is people who believe they need a license to exercise liberty