Re: Forum Leaderboard (top 100) as of 8/14/2014 Imo. Post count has nothing to do with being a great forumer. I don't think you should categorize a forum leaderboard and basing it off of post count. I some what understand, since what else is there to base it off of? Other than votes, but that just leads to unwanted biased votes. Neat thread you have though. Hope it drives people to be more active on the forums, rather than post count farming. As slayerbob said... Quality > Quantity
Re: Forum Leaderboard (top 100) as of 8/14/2014 Yet 90% of this "leaderboard" are great forumers. So.
Re: Forum Leaderboard (top 100) as of 8/14/2014 What happened to forum (president?) the voting and such? Wasn't it discontinued due to how hard everybody was trying and such?
Re: Forum Leaderboard (top 100) as of 8/14/2014 Oli is right Moose didn't you have like 10,000 after just one year? Lol
Re: Forum Leaderboard (top 100) as of 8/14/2014 According to anyone who knows anything about forums. Apparently you do not.
Re: Forum Leaderboard (top 100) as of 8/14/2014 The longer somebody has been in forums for, the more likely they are to have improved and become a better Forumer: they will probably have more posts as well. This is why a leaderboard like this is more reliable than one based on voting, it's just that positioning isn't really relevant here.
Re: Forum Leaderboard (top 100) as of 8/14/2014 :lol: Apparently you have no idea what an opinion is either.
Re: Forum Leaderboard (top 100) as of 8/14/2014 Nice thread. I can't believe the amount of posts by them
Re: Forum Leaderboard (top 100) as of 8/14/2014 I think that Oli is right when he says most of those listed are the better forumers. That's how I see them, probably because they're the people I remember most, and I wouldn't go out of my way to remember sub-par posters.