The Wasteland.

Thank you meme you picked up what I was putting down and I think your idea would solve the issue. Dividing up hansels might get tricky but it's better than nothing.
 
Kezzer said:
No support needs more todd

In all seriousness this is an interesting concept. The main issue I have is when you add in tiers you put specific players at an advantage or a disadvantage. Some players are going to be put in the top of their bracket meaning they are at an advantage over those in their bracket weaker than them. Some players will be at the bottom of their bracket meaning they have a disadvantage over the other players in the same bracket.

Personally I would keep everything the same about this event but I would make it a lowland only event. All players use their lowlands as their build which means players can not only easily change it up to make it suitable for how they want to play the event but it also means all players in kaw will be at a level playing field. No need for brackets this way.
Click to expand...

I couldn't disagree more with this.

What are the benefits of an increased size?
to gain more plunder per hit, to hit harder ebs and to hit other players of your size range.

To make this lowland only would defeat the entire point of growth - we have LL wars to cater for the equality for pvp.

This needs to show the slogging out of larger players vs larger players and smaller players vs smaller players. But also, possibly more importantly, it needs to cater for the mid-size builds. So they can see where they can adjust in future for their style of play.

Having the tiers makes this less about size anyway. This is about activity. Activity and tactical attacking/turtling. To make this LL only would only seek to waste time of those that improve their builds.
 
Drgn said:
Support.

Although to be fair to everyone, I'd prefer to see a no xtal rule myself.
Click to expand...

Whilst ideal and I understand your issue in regards to fairness - there needs to be some benefit to developers and if this accompanied a one-time 24 crystal bundle for half price in preparation (with the choice of a nobility purchase for using free nobility) then that's the best way to make that balance
 
Meme said:
It definitely would be an issue. They could make the brackets based on build to be more fair, and this could still be with CS tiers as well.

Three different brackets
1. >75% attack
2. >25% attack and >25% spy
3. >75% spy
Towers could either be counted or not, wouldn't really matter that much, and these brackets could be divided more based on cs.

For those who think that having all builds in a single bracket wouldn't be a disadvantage to hansels, think about how hansels are less likely to get a lot of successful attacks, which is how you get the plunder bonus from allies. Steals wouldn't be nearly as effective, hence making hansels much less effective if this event.
Click to expand...

This is a fair point that's been raised and a fair solution provided. Tiers of build type and size would be the best way to counter most of the issues. The rewards would work as per OP, with nobility, crystal and SB rewards but slightly more variation between them
 
Kezzer said:
Personally I would keep everything the same about this event but I would make it a lowland only event. All players use their lowlands as their build which means players can not only easily change it up to make it suitable for how they want to play the event but it also means all players in kaw will be at a level playing field. No need for brackets this way.
Click to expand...

Support for the lowland part!!
 
The thing I love most about this idea is that it will be a true battle of the titans. I am frankly curious as to know who will win in the higher brackets, who, when their spending is limited, and when they are forced to attack players of similiar size, activity, and ferocity.

It would almost feel like FC ;) .
 
Moody said:
This is a fair point that's been raised and a fair solution provided. Tiers of build type and size would be the best way to counter most of the issues. The rewards would work as per OP, with nobility, crystal and SB rewards but slightly more variation between them
Click to expand...

Did... did we just calmly and intelligently improve upon an idea using multiple people's opinions? This is not the kaw forums I know!
 
Support sounds like a really good idea definatley something i'd participate in, Possibly a little bit of work needed but really like the concept of it
 
Ganesha said:
Moody said:
This is a fair point that's been raised and a fair solution provided. Tiers of build type and size would be the best way to counter most of the issues. The rewards would work as per OP, with nobility, crystal and SB rewards but slightly more variation between them
Click to expand...

Did... did we just calmly and intelligently improve upon an idea using multiple people's opinions? This is not the kaw forums I know!
Click to expand...
Ikr?! I was so proud of myself for holding back the urge to troll.

Helps that this is a good idea that I like
 
Ganesha said:
Moody said:
This is a fair point that's been raised and a fair solution provided. Tiers of build type and size would be the best way to counter most of the issues. The rewards would work as per OP, with nobility, crystal and SB rewards but slightly more variation between them
Click to expand...

Did... did we just calmly and intelligently improve upon an idea using multiple people's opinions? This is not the kaw forums I know!
Click to expand...
We did indeed xD
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top