Should War be Fair?

Discussion in 'Wars' started by Imitation-Cheese, Feb 6, 2014.

  1. I recall quite a few tears being shed here in forums about timers being "cheating."
     
  2. Cyn - totally agree

    Ashes - you're a monster! 
     
  3. No it's war. You fight for power and dominance. You don't fight for sportsmanship points. You fight to win and only win.
     
  4. I fight for teh lulz
     
  5. War isn't fair. War costs lives. This is a video game people play to have fun and socialise. Yes this should be fair.
     
  6. Pretty pointless thread. First of all, this is a war "game" with the emphasis on game. If there weren't some guidelines then no one would play. Of course if you wanna smack someone around, go for it.


    Put more effort into your threads or stop littering the threads with this third rate crap.
     
  7. I agree with tmh. Dev sponsored "wars"/tournaments should be on an even footing as much as possible. Osw is total war and shouldn't be taken lightly. Of course, there are mechanics and glitches that can be taken advantage of within both. That is just strategy
     
  8. If this is real life war, then the question itself is flawed. War itself has no boundaries of "fair", it's about two sides trying to push the other out of its limits until they can't take it anymore. One side thinks the other is wrong meaning no one wants to treat anyone with fairness because "everyone except us are wrong" and when a person is "wrong" they don't deserve fairness.
     
  9. There's different ways of war. One is all out hate and war (exploit and cheating e.g. Starting before war and just all out mean)

    The other is respectful and graceful. You fight strong. Lose or win you show respect for enemies when you cut them down or they cut you. There's no cheating, it is exactly the same for both sides. It's too see whom is truly better at their own game
     

  10. even "trash talk"? ... hmm ... so why do players "fighting against" the "thrash talk" ALWAYS "win"? ...
     
  11. ... and what exactly does "osw" mean? ... when did you name any kind of "fights" an "osw"? ...
     
  12. why exactly do you need to name me? ... want to get rid of A SINGLE player in a war game??? ... what is your real reason for that? ... do I "disturb" your "warring" ... "someohow"? ... how exactly? ...
     
  13. sure of that? ... I'm not ... it would just alterate ... and not end up like it does in here ... by always same "winners" and "losers" ...
     
  14. yes ... a game ... btw ... if you don't even know my gender ... what exactly do you know about me? ... and what gives YOU the right to ask for getting me kicked out of this game? ... did you fail making me leave "at any cost"? ... shall devs win the "fight" for you? ...
     
  15. now ... I agree up to the point that you exclude the so called "osws" ... as even an osw should be "bit more realisctic" ... atm it absolutely is not ... a single player who is in a quite well clan with all unlocked bonuses giving max stats additionally ... got all kind of defense pots ... got huge BFA and huge BFE ... just the stats got "adjusted" FOR DEFENSE ONLY (they got abused by MUCH higher sizes when they had been bigger) ... can be harmed though without any chance to defend effectively ... just by "game mechanics" ...

    as if that player wasn't protected at all the defense can be eliminated quite effectively by someone staying outside and hitting with almost nothing ... this nothing doesn't just make a bit of scratches to the massive gate ... NO ... it blasts holes to that gate with every single hit ...

    or let's say it in KAWish ... every single FAIL assa decimates full sets of defense pots by just pressing a button with NO need of any kind of strength ...

    so the attacker ONLY is protected bc he doesn't even have any defense pots as he is staying outside unprotectedly but "invulnerable" to the DEFENDER though ... interesting ... the one visibly staying at your front with NO DEFENSE at all can't be harmed at all, but the one sitting in a tower can ...

    so ... the most weird thing about it is ... devs got a build-in "mechanics" against those who successfully find ways to JUST PROTECT themselves ... the first time I had dropped my build NO ONE could attack me at all and got a "dtw" back ... the max I lost was one of the cheapest def pot only! ... the last few times I had dropped my build every single hit of ANY attacker within my hit range did STILL NOT eliminate full sets, too, only single few very huge ones (which should have been out of my hit range, which was ZERO!) came through and could harm me though ... this last time I dropped is even the other way around ... even smallest(!) sizes of attackers can clear full sets of any kind of def pots with ANY kind of FAILS only ... and the hit range did rise, too ...

    to me it looks like I SHALL lose in ANY case ... but now it's provenly not the single "warrior" who beats me but the "game mechanics" ONLY ...

    those who always said "don't whine! just hit back!" do visisbly ignore the fact that I ALWAYS did hit BACK ... BEST I could ... ALWAYS! (I mostly used to ignore smaller sizes though) ... and when it didn't work AT ALL I backed off and did hide myself ... AND ... NOT TO FORGET, payed the HIGHEST price for it, too! ...

    whatfor have all the "extras" like BFA, BFE, and huge amount of def pots been? ... whatfor has the clan bonuses been if even a single player who dropped all his defense pots (staying outside kinda naked) can beat me though in ANY case? ... considering that I'm not the aggressor I can't call this "warring" at all ...but just losing by game mechanics only ...
     
  16. I did sacrifice MANY, MANY trillions to figure out those game mechanics btw ... so my banner on my main is FULLY justified ...
     
  17. btw ... I didn't leave the game bc I want to fight for the right of DEFENDERS, too ...

    both got a right on having fun in a game ... attackers AND defenders! ...

    especially when they did pay for the "game"! ...
     
  18. and to answer the question of the topic ...

    yes ... it should ... as it's revenge ONLY which keeps up ANY wars ... and in real life those who warred in an unfair way failed in keeping up a stable peace ... still a lot of crime in so called "higher" societies ... or look at those states who never stopped warring ... NO ONE can remain "the fittest" eternally ... even cheating won't help one day ...

    give evolution a chance and let's learn out of our mistakes ...

    and let's keep KAW a game ...
     
  19. War is never fair. You always good for ways to get advantages
     
  20. :lol: Genius logic...it's free...and peace ... No bully