@King monster - no **** sherlock, thats why I, n everyone else wars wit sh's most of the time, which is the reason for thread....
I am an sh, and I do stack sh and tanks. But I like this idea. Maybe it's something devs will implement? But until then I won't be following it as unfortunately I need the wins to start this clan. Full support to a dev inplamentation though only 3/11 as sh seems fair
I am a friend of Sav, and a SH myself. I dropped from 7m cs atk build because I couldn't win in we, the only clan that let a mid with those stats war were low teir merc clans. I fully support this. SH reign victories everywhere, and are always wanted. Stacking lowers your hit ratio greatly, for an easy victory, and yes, it's cheap. I enjoy winning, but it was a great cost for this. TL;DR, I support a SH free sunday
Lol funny how ppl say that SH are an exploit to system...it's part of the system not an exploit lmfao so was GH
@Reaper, something has to be a part of the system in order to be an exploit. The land trick used to be for any time you built a building on land, allowing you to destroy and rebuild buildings. Part of the system, still an exploit.
Saven is a friend and I respect his oppinions. I dropped to SH to help in wars in ways that my mid-att couldn't. That being said, I think entire wars being fought with 11vs11 SH is just not good for the game. Now, lets see if the devs would like to assist us instead of scrapping another build. My idea is simple. Let them set parameters, to which if we dont meet them, we dont qualify for war. Something like... 1big-9mid-1sh___2big-2mid-7sh___3big-0mid-8sh___8big-0mid-2sh___etc, etc. Not even sure it can be done with a similar formula because of bfe/bfa, but if everyone wants similar cs wars, then strict guidelines will need to be administered and enforced. Should be easy to pick (from a list) the type of war our clan wants to do. In any case, this would allow wc/owners to allow everyone the same oppertunities to fight, thus allowing more clans the warring option. Blah, blah, blah, blah, just an idea for a way to keep warriors happy. (as if thats possible)
No, this game is for all players. We shouldn't punish players for having a nice build. All this will do is waste SH's time trying to convert BACK to another build
With the wars full of SH it's punishing the mids like myself. So your statement that it's punishing the SH to have a few wars free of them kind of lost. Savan isn't asking for all wars to be SH free, though it would be nice, he is just asking for a day of SH-less wars so others can war and have their fun with EE too.
What should happen is devs should limit roster variety. Your smallest player shouldn't be 3x smaller than your biggest player.
Support to your idea savan.. hit ratios still need working on how can a 3,5m cs sh hit 15m+ cs hansles even lb players just doesnt match up