Thus far Russia has been treated as if they are nothing on the global stage than a thorn in the side of capitalism. The difference is now a three way sting. First Russia has already successfully annexed a region without any real opposition. This proved that the west is unwilling to act in a manner to provoke open warfare. Russia has a strong ( though emotionally damaged ) leader. The west in Cameron have a high class lads club imbecile with more ideals than real world understanding, and certainly not willing to stand his ground having reduced British capability. America. The international police force has shown that through Obama they have a weak leader compared to recent headstrong presidents. The result Russia is now in a position where it can quite rightly step back onto the world stage and demand equal recognition in global matters. The most aggravating part is this scenario was entirely predictable. The entire situation has been so poorly handled, that it left Russia no choice other than to act. The most shameful part is. That out of pride and arrogance. They were not invited to act as part of a coalition force for mutually beneficial gain. Instead we now have a more volatile game of stupid politicians and egos. Distracted from the main goal of globally stability free of terrorist groups. And instead we now have what amounts to world leaders whipping it out in the school playground going mines bigger than yours.
It's nice to know others recognise Cameron's shockingly poor account when it comes to foreign affairs. Not that pig-gate is a stellar domestic show...
Well russia went and bombed our allies who were fighting assad and not isis...who knows what will happen now
Russia's technology is superior compared to the United States, even their SU-35's and 47's can outperform F-22.
I hope we finally quit meddling in foreign countries! Bring our troops home and use that money to pay teachers better, pay for healthcare for the elderly and the poor, and fix our roads! All those trillions wasted on those goddamn wars with not a ******* thing to show for it! Jesus Christ, that **** pisses me off every goddamn time I think about it.
I'm sorry I just saw this and couldn't believe the level of stupidity you've stooped to. If you ban guns, only the bad people have guns. Shootings are horrible events. But just because someone gets in a car accident doesn't mean we should ban cars. Bad stuff happens. And if you take away guns from everyone, the ONLY people with guns are law enforcement and the people with malicent intent. /rant sorry lol I'm very opinionated on this.
What the **** are people doing in Syria anyway ... Civilians should not go into radical states under massive turmoil
I will say this, I am a teen and if there is World War Three, my dreams would be shattered. I would most likely be drafted into the military if it is anything like the other ones. I won't be able to go to college and finish my education. If I survived the war I would come back and try to find a job. Guess what you need to get a job? A degree. And since I didn't go to college I would be homeless or very poor. What I am trying to say is that it would ruin teenagers lives and their dreams would all be crumbled and thrown away.
They asked US to keep our planes out of the area, to avoid any collateral damage to our troops. We may or may not HELP them out anyways.
To the idiot who suggested that gun laws would solve any sort of gun problem; what happened during the prohibition of alcohol did it stop the creation and subsequent consumption of alcohol, no not at all. So please tell me how making guns illegal would stop the use of guns.
The events of December 7th, 1941 were a hell of a fabrication cheese. I'm appalled at the idiocy of your post. You're a moron. No.....morons typically have an IQ above ambient room temperature. Please do tell me how the passengers on the Lusitania committed suicide to help propel America into World War I as well. If you hate America so much, get the hell out, and don't let the door hit you were the good lord split you.