Re: Regarding War Abuse Ninzu that is supposed to make it hard to scroll . Thats the whole point of trash titles. Only time it hurts you is if you are hitting the other roster.
Re: Regarding War Abuse Chris406, inactive till 10 mins left and 1 action, their is a simple flaw to the inactivity punishment, please give him the spell where he cant war for 3 days
Re: Regarding War Abuse Chris406 purposely make us loss the war . With a Att of 3 m against sh less than 1 m. Is impossible 1 action. And he keep come out at CC . Mean he never even bother to fight.
Re: Regarding War Abuse I think it is simple to tag inactives based upon the first plunder update. If the player has no successful or failed actions after the first plunder update (around 10mins), then they should be considered inactive. Only the devs will be able to tell this information, as spy actions don't register plunder in the sense of plunder. This completely covers the case where a Hansel or Pure Spy is tanking, and leads with spies. This also covers the case where an Atk/Hybrid build assn SH/SSH because there are no plunder targets (against mostly SH targets). Even if the player goes active after the first plunder update, and contributes to the team win/loss, they have placed the team further into a hole from the beginning by not being there. They should be penalized.
Re: Regarding War Abuse Inactives, moles, whatever. People will continue to do indies because that's the only forum for most kaw to war. Look at the war 14 matches. If u aren't a sh or high lb, why bother. The devs promised a ee fix, apparently Indie wars are it. Hugely disappointing.
Re: Regarding War Abuse 90 ppl warring in 14. How many do you suppose would have warred if this was an indi war??
Re: Regarding War Abuse Maybe you should change your post to say only one account per household or IP address. That way people who live together don't get screwed
Hey everyone, after looking over your feedback from the past few days we've reevaluated the rule about players only being able to participate in wars on a single account. In the end we've decided to remove this rule as it caused confusion and was only put in place to prevent other forms of war abuse from taking place. That said, we have added a note that various other forms of war abuse will be dealt with on a case by case basis as they are brought to our attention. Action taken may include temporary/permanent war bans, silences, or account bans depending on the severity of the issue. In short, you're now able to war on multiple accounts, but play fair.
Ty was going to screw a lot of same house players ... Sucks but hopefully u can weed out the actual abusers effectively without hindering real separate account holders from enjoying ee
What about putting logs from the same ip in thesame clan? so like I cast my alt and my main and we are put in one clan together so I cant mole/purposely leak.
no a bad idea. But could also be abused because I could have a party and invite friends who war together a lot lol Whoop some noob ass
Yeah tho I dont think alot of warrers out there live close to each other. And your network would be likely to skip ticks cus of changing network times
Yay, no more complaining from all the noobs. I don't war so i don't care that much, but hopefully nobody complains about this anymore
I find it sad that a person of leadership, that we are supposed to look up to, can be so darn mean, and immature