The innocent are in safe camps. Let us beat the threat. Then they can return and re build. Do you honoestly believe they will leave here when its all over? Again going back to over population
Maybe we can build places for them here. But they should NOT be allowed to stay. When its over they should have to return.
Your government leaders and homeland security is already addressing those issues. No need to fuel the refugee hatred, they're not like lambs that you can just bark at.
Cynder strike they are mostly young males. Slightly misinformed you are! We send our 20 yo to help them and they come here. Lets fix home then worry about sissys to scared to fight for their country. And the vetting of these refugees has been less. Well they got no papers to vet . Watch news much ? High officials have no way to verify anything. Most dont feel obligated to anything with the refugees. We send money and milotary to help. Beyond that they shoud fight for what they want. Objections? Young males running like . ! But we run too..gtf ouuta here. War is ugly but it is what it is. Bomb the hell out of them in every last corner they can hide. Our dumb ass president is scared to define the enemy . They are islamo nazis. We do what we did to germany and we win. This aint sports tbere is not participation awards even for the losers
does ANYONE deny that terrorist will come with the mass horde of refugees? If not why do you feel obligated to help one person and hurt another? And the very person you may be hurting is someone in your family or any other American.
Tell that to your next President. You have the guts to suggest something that can be easily done. How much was your defense budget during Iraq & Afghanistan "vampire hunt"? What happen to your economy after that?
No they are not mostly young males. Stop getting your 'facts' from main stream media who's owners profit from Middle Eastern wars. You sound like you aren't even of the age to vote.
You are both wrong. There is NOT more males. But there also isnt a vast more majority of woman and children then men. There is an equal number. The men arent staying behind leaving their families. So dont try and act like yall are both right when yall are clearly both wrong. Either way im all for helping refugees. But im not for helping terrorists who will come with them. Solution? Expanded safe camps heavily defended to not allow causalties to innocent. ISIS could be eradicated and no terrorists can easily sneak into any countries that took in to many refugees.
Thats the closest you can get to a win/win situation. Id like to here a closer one if yall could please tell me it.
They don't come in hordes to the United States. We have taken very few and it has been an orderly process. Show me proof of otherwise. The US refugee program is nothing like the crisis that is happening in Europe.
Have you not watched any news man? America is expected to take in between 75 to 100 thousand refugees. Thats not a little my friend.
Maybe not all 100 thousand at once. But still large amounts. 10 thousand is expected to be coming at once. Yea "orderly and few" yea right man.
We are much more capable than Europe. If we can't handle 10,000 people we don't deserve global leadership. Lol come on man. You aren't doing a very good interpretation of anyone's views. I don't believe you are that mentally challenged.
You are so naive my friend. The point isnt the amount of people. The point is the amount of terrorist a group that size may bring
Some states don't want to take refugees. You know what? That's cool. Some starts can't handle the refugees. Like New Jersey for example. I wouldn't recommend sending refugees into Jersey. Some of these other states however have globally ranked economies, like top 25. States rights work out with your nieghbors. Good luck dude.
But i like how your point went from "orderly and few" to 100 thousand being a fraction of our intake of immigrants and refugees. If your gonna try and make a point changing it up isnt the way to go my friend