Dear the idiots that say going Pure Spy is *****. Did you guys even read the second post? It said it spot on the mark, Hansel is a build made for plunder. It's war equivalent is pure spy. If being smart in a war, is soft, then you obviously have an IQ of about 70. Word said it exactly, have 1 ally, 10-15b, when war comes, drop it and rely on cash banked in pots. Some people ignorance and stupidity on this thread... :twisted:
Wow, great job Sire, nice to see you read the first post and made a one sentence reply. At least it wasn't a fact. (Ever thought of looking at the second post?) :|
Machine. If you get stripped as a hansel, why would you not drop to pure spy? If you think, that playing the game mechanics in a strategy app, to their full extent is cowardly... Then you sir, need serious help.
@Anarchy It appears that you dont know **** about pure spy or hansel. Mechanics wise hansel is a far far far superior build than a pure spy. It appears that the only reason you are a pure spy is that you want to get stripped and dont know other advantages of hansel. I take my comment about cowardice back. Every pure spy might not be a coward.
Hmm... Guess I'm a EB noob then... Always found it fun to succesfully attack a attackbuild... Guess using a hansel as a warbuild is wrong and I should convert to a pure spy... /end sarcasm
"The only reason you want to be a pure spy is because you want to get stripped." If you 'knew' as much as what you supposedly do about game mechanics, you would know a proper pure spy carries no allies Derp. :| As for the comment of hansel being a "far far superior build". I don't know where you're pulling this from... Actually, I do, from random crap in your head. But the main only difference between pure spy and hansel, is pure spy can't be hit with 0 gold...? Wow... :|
Enforcer. That I agree with, but to be able to attack successfully, you will most likely need to have a large BFA. If you don't have the play time to back that up in war, a hansel is a sitting duck. If you do have the time to put in to a war, a hansel will win if you have the BFA, as you can dominate through both. But calling pure spies cowardly is s joke, it's just all in the play style. For now, that's all I'll say.
@Anarchy Incase you haven't noticed, i corrected my statement afterwards. I know pure spy doesn't have allies. And cant be stripped. As for why Hansel is a superior build. Read this whole thread and you might actually get an idea.
@anarchy, a lvl 7 bow also helps a lot mith, pots... And I guess I don't need to explain how a hansel would attack a attackbuild... I succesfully hit attackbuilds with 5M defence and 13adp.... Do I need to say more?
If you stayed hansel for two years, then you're even a bigger idiot than i thought :lol: Anyways, this is turning into a "whos the bigger idiot situation". I'm taking off.
Yeah I was taking that into account, though BFA plays a decent part. (Although the bow is kick-ass.) Anyway, who really cares, it's just play style. At the end of the day, I like pure spy and hansel, I just happen to be pure spy now. Whatever you guys like is chill. However, no build is cowardly. It's a strategy game, you play to your strengths. If anyone mentions cowardly again, direct them to this post. (and feel free to let me know... :lol: )
How am I an idiot for being a hansel? Qad you are childish, knick off, learn how to piece a sentence together, and then learn how to voice your opinion without sounding like a complete tool. Why I lower myself to people like your standard, really does beat me...
@enforcer. Thats quite a feat. But not too hard to do. Just assas the attack till almost pin. Then attack full pots. With the newest attack pot the hammer. It gives 1.2m attack stats equivilent. So thats 1.2m attack extra on top of all the other pots. Can be done.