Primal Wars...do they work for you?

Discussion in 'Ideas + Feature Requests' started by MY______wAdI_sHeTa______TH, Feb 22, 2015.

  1. As expected you couldn't explain why capping bfa based on cs would not remove the sh issue so instead you dribbled on with nonsense. How exactly did you "prove me wrong?".

    Btw my old SH who I quit playing after s3 is still better equipped then you if you wanna brag about equip. (BR0KENSW0RD)

    This account was never an SH. It was a small attack build who was created to be an ally of my main and nothing more. When I came back to the game a few weeks ago I reset it and built to around 5-6m cs (atk build), then swapped to a towered spy build, then dropped to statless to check out the outrageous mith gain I seen some statless accounts gain, and now growing as a ps/ps1 (never was building bfa as an sh like you claim).

    Though poking holes in your rage walls of text was semi-entertaining, it's getting quite boring.
     
  2. They did fix wars, they nerfed the sh like everyone wanted, now only half the people that could war before can war now....
     
  3. If you build it we will beat it.
     
  4. Round and primal suck . Primal you have to be ps. Round sh with bfa....the only decently matched wars are indi and there you get noobs that mole, go inactive or dont xtal....so get back to season wars so we can weed the garbage out assp
     
  5. I havnt read any other replies to this, but it looks like you havnt really put much thought into this. Primal wars have a consistent matchup everytime unlike round wars. There are at least 5 clans that put a roster together for every war. Lately there have been 3-4 matchups every war which is 90-120 ppl warring in primal every war. As for being under 20m cs it is very easy to find war if you have a decent build and decent war ability.
     
  6. 1st- moron for not realizing an alt of a longtime player.
    2nd- off topic, as I am now by pointing stupidity out.
     
  7. I think primals are ok, not my favorite but compared to round and indi its a whole lot better. I liked round when I had the build for it, which was pretty much sh or tank/lb, but now as u can see I'm a hansel and round Hansel/ps doesn't exactly work lol. As for indi, I don't like dealing with Noobs and annoying people, which is what indi consists of lol. Like I said, primal is ok for me because I have the build for it and it's better than round and indi imo, but I hope to see devs make a new type of war soon. Something that can somehow allow all/most builds to war in it. I know that's near impossible to do but if enough work is put into it I think it can happen. Either that or there needs to be some new type of system for wars. Matching needs to be fixed, maybe they can add something with tiers or wars with certain builds or similar builds, etc... You guys get the point lol. Oh and OP also I agree with you that a LOT less people war now than before, one of those people being me lol.
     
  8. Primal War CS vs CS hardly kills wars. Non war builds do not belong in clan wars til ready.
    IWars r the format to learn war n grow n join a war clan.
    Round Wars were offset by Primal War for war clans needing a format.
    Bigger issues r fixing Round War n revisiting if Primals need tweaks.
    Anyone expecting to war with any build ready or not for war have options n cannot complain.
     
  9. Go do a round and match Troy and His SH for all who say Round is better then te me how you feel lol.
     
  10. I have warred in every season, I have witnessed things go from bad to worse with exploit after exploit on top of exploit. Is primal the optimal war type? Maybe not, but it is far better than LB,SH or LB,PS.
    With the start of s5 you will see more clans warring & better matches. Yes it may take some experimentation & some build changes but its nothing I haven't done countless times because plain and simply I love war. Respect and thanks to all of you that make it possible friend and foes.
     
  11. Yes true it is more about towers
     
  12. Primal wars defeat the overall point of the game; to have the strongest Kingdom. It takes years to build up BFA, and all of a sudden, it doesn't matter? Atleast if you are going to have primal wars, have an even share of round wars to go along with it. If not, just remove primal and round and just b2b indis that way people have no complain to make, and atleast everyone can participate. Bring back 5-6 wars a day if possible ️ty.
     
  13. EE is a game in itself, strategic intens wars, you still have to build a kingdom for it though. for "it took years to build up BFA" What was its purpose before EE? Same as now
     
  14. Building up BFA takes time and effort, and this effort should be rewarded, not dismissed with the introduction of primal wars.
     
  15. Eh, everyone already knows Primal Groudon is the better one. Though cereally war is war, ATA can change the rewards for better or worse but the wars themselves will always be pay to win, at least if a clan is serious about warring.
     
  16. It is rewarded in pvp
     
  17. What about towers? They come in handy
    Or is an EB build supposed to do any war?
    Be happy there r IWars or many ppl would find war takes a lot of time to build for. Clan wars take organizing well built kingdoms.
    BFA is only 1 part of a build for warring.
     
  18. And how well rewarding is PVP?
     
  19. EQ n Banner for those who can use it.
    U should be happy u can war at all.
    BFA is only a part of a war build.
    Suggesting removing all clan wars is senseless n all IWars is pointless.
    Don't like clan wars don't join them.
    Use your BFA for OSW like others do if u worked so hard n long for it.
     
  20. How well rewarding is ee? Gives eq to use in ee, to win eq to use in ee etc. :|