Primal & Individual Wars (8/18 - 8/24)

Discussion in 'Past Events' started by [ATA]Grant, Aug 15, 2014.

  1. I'm pretty sure biggest spenders (LB) do not participate in many Wars. And they already have all the good equipment from stacking and exploiting anyway.

    Indi gives those who don't have access to a good clan a chance. Normal wars are dominated by a select few clans who stack their way to a high W/L ratio.

    Primal wars make the SH exploit weaker and level the ground between the top players and mid level players.

    Both war types help mids, who in the past have been abused and left in the Dark. Devs are trying to make wars easier to access and fairer for all. its also Increasing participation. This means more people are purchase crystals.

    So devs are helping the middle man and increasing revenue potentially. What's wrong with that? Anyone who dislikes it is either; a SH, an exploiter or an elitist
     
  2. Although personally I think all system wars suck...
     
  3. Wait, kaw is dying because more people are warring in system wars?

    What you are seeing now is an influx of spending by more people whom are actually encouraged to grow and tower up, making equipment and allies for individual wars, osw, and vanity reasons.

    More wars, more (potential) crystal revenue, from wars themselves, and more being thrust on EBs by (system) warriors whom are now encouraged to grow, or adjusting current build.

    With the emergence of primal wars, clans are starting to form their own brackets per say, such as Asguard Infantry as I've noticed, whom only war accounts within a smaller range.

    I applaud these changes, yet would be short sighted to not include the three types of war structures ; individual, primal and (classic) clan into a season long tournament for s4, as to include all instead of excluding any.

    Whilst it would have been wise to just assign each warrior a value based on an actual strength formula (variable cs, fixed cs, BFA, bfe), and have each kingdom profit/lose plunder based on a fair formula, this is what we have (for) now. It's not perfect, but it's viewed as progress by most, which gives hope.
     
  4. Wow....love the amount of war opporunities. Thanks devs :-D
     
  5. Re: Primal

    i love primal wars , finaly only build and strat are the key to a victory or a lose !
    ty devs to create this system war , and good job on the new schedules about the extra regen ;)
     
  6. Indi wars are still my favorite, but nice work on the new schedule changes. Support
     
  7. These new wars seriously suck.. terrible going devs.

    Indi wars are filled with alts, not only that it, the worst part about it is they are such a coin flip. If you wanna keep doing indi, you gotta really nor row down the build types you put in.

    Now primal wars... don't even get me started with this terrible war style.. This war type is nerfing all the mids such as myself for war. Mids get wrecked by all the HFBC with, and by being so relatively smaller than them is so hard to win successful actions against them.. not to mention the joke of the plunder made from them.

    So this war type is basically for against SH and any Hansel build as the plunder will literally be close to nothing and only for PS and and HFBC.. sucks for me.

    Bring back clan wars this is BS
     
  8. Re: Primal

    "Stop stacking, they get the clan wars back"

    Best quote I've heard in a long time 
     
  9. Re: Primal

    [​IMG]
     
  10. Re: Primal

    Support for this.
     
  11. Re: Primal

    Classic sucks big time. I'll only war advantage.
     
  12. After warring (primal) with some really good clans the past few weeks, I've come to the decision that the system isn't really broken. Stacking is still happening, and its ok. I've seen WC's successfully build rosters to match a specific clan. Its not that difficult to get good matches. You just need to be educated about who's warring in your weight class. Build a better roster people, ffs...
     
  13. Primals have NOT needed the sh build. The strategy of using sh to lower cs of the roster is still working. Plunder payout is vastly reduced, but the clan doesn't have to match up with a bunch of lb tanks. A win with a couple mill in plunder is exactly the same as a win with many billions in plunder. Its all a matter of perspective.
     
  14. Damn autocorrect… sh are not nerfed…
     
  15. Re: Primal

    I want classic wars back as much as anyone. But the key may very well be in us players taking more responsibility in creating clans to war them. As cal said, I am out here in the super small bracket hoping more clans form up like me so we can match.

    We have sotuw and wwrpu and mk and no remorse in a bracket.

    Ghost legion, dotb, battlegrounds.

    Warlor, zaft, Sylver....

    Some cross over occasionally up and down and that's okay. But maybe if we could work on policing ourselves and setting balanced rosters of similar strength, where our own bottoms can reach and even succeed in attacking or defending against our tops, we can create a better ee atmosphere.

    I know for me that a close with numerous lead changes and great tactics is much more fun and exciting than playing whackamole for an hour, even if the first was a loss.

    Just my opinion.
     
  16. Re: Primal

    What does ally hire: war only mean?
     
  17. The devs are pushing us towards iwars…its obvious…its the only "fair" format out there…they are much quicker to fix any issues in iwars…clan wars for EE are most likely over after s4…only 4 to 6 matches per time slot…nobody is screaming for more primal wars…they want more iwars
     
  18. Re: Primal

    SH r not nerfed for Primal War nor Indy War
    ALL they need do is go ALL SH n match one another prolly
     
  19. Re: Primal

    @FROG

    Hooray for exercising ur freedom of choice
     
  20. Re: Primal

    Amazing indi war devs!