Possible means to eliminate non-xtal users in war.

Discussion in 'Ideas + Feature Requests' started by Randomeyze, Oct 21, 2014.

  1. Lol yup im making way to much on hte to waste my time with u
     
  2. Oh I see. Next time put a disclaimer my threats are only good for people too small for me to hit,chump.
     
  3. Thats silly because since u are to small for me to hit I wouldnt be able to hit wannabe heros like u and you spelling needs improved
    Its spelt #champ
     
  4. Trust me I'm not too small to hit. Go ahead and try. It's just like hitting that hte except no repeat Acton button.
     
  5. I'm seeing this as army A vs army B. Randomly selected who is in which army. But everyone needs to bring their own weapons, but if some of army A dont bring their weapons, because "they dont see the need of them" and get killed by army B, from which all the soldiers have weapons and thus get their own army outnumbered and screwed over, I'd say its their fault for losing the war. You need every advantage you can get in the ideal war to win. Yup I agree we could all just not use weapons, but there is always one person that wants that advantage. So I'd say 1 xtal is mandatory. So make it either a double-league'd war system (xtal and non xtal), take one xtal per war from the players inventory, or ban xtals from war.

    My rambling is done
     
  6. I enjoy winning indis with no xtls. I only xtl in Primal :lol: Its gotten me pretty far :lol:

    Hate all you want. Im not using my money so that people idk get benefited. Hell no. Ill save my xtls for when I war with friends or family.
     
  7. Hmm lets see.
    Xtals are a must for teams to win. Agreed.
    Most decent ee players that still ee are part of a set team that they enjoy working with. Others have stopped warring.

    Should ee warriors have to pay to win? No

    But it is an unwritten rule.

    Should kaw be pay to win? Ideal world. Never. But that's not how competitive players work.

    Can kaw implement this. No. Why?
    Because then an aspect of the game becomes pay to play changing the rating and status of the game driving players away and damaging their reputation.

    I like the idea. Honest. But it isn't right to force players to pay to play on a free app.
    You cannot force casual gamers to pay.
    And if you make this game totally pay to play which would suit many. It would kill much of the diversity of the community that makes this game special.
     
  8. No support. What a dumb idea. OP fite me irl.

    I refuse to xtal in indys. (unless opportunity presents itself proper and smells good too)

    I indy with full adp too. What do you say we do about that? I think Yup will tell you what to do about it.
     
  9. Full adp? :lol: what an ass
     
  10. Remember kaw is not ee farming or any tap tap function. It's a game tacked on to a free chatroom, that players from all around the world can meet people they would never otherwise meet.
    Kaws strength is its community, chat and social aspects are why this game has thrived.
    The recent move towards a more professional game is great for revenue. But the push towards getting casual players to leave, driving friends to other apps is what would damage this more than anything.
    War must always be few to participate in. Kaw must be free to participate in.
    Pay for an advantage is player choice and fine. But payment upfront cannot be supported.
     
  11. lelz

    Shattered sword!? Wut an ass. xD
     
  12. Free not few. Bleep auto ^
     
  13. Actually. I opened for the other team as PS with gold out and went to bed.

    Why? Bc I hated 2 people on my side :lol: We still won...

    Guess what noob forgot to hit once at the beginning :mrgreen:
     
  14. No support. You sound like dev ball boy
     
  15. lol ^support!!!
     
  16. NO SUPPORT
     
  17. What about placing those without xtals in thier own indi wars? Or a separate wave of conflict to cast for people that don't want to use Thiers. That would solve the issue. Devs could evenly distribute non xtal users, or have a war or two of nonxtal users.
     
  18. Because everyone, with the exception of pars dumb ass, would then opt out of using xtals. The devs are happy to get the ones they can.
     
  19. I already said why the Rutgers wouldn't work... Need to read people!
     
  20. Wow autocorrect.... Tiers not Rutgers lmao