Since when did tanks do better than Hansels on MITH in EE? It's always been spies who have earned more Mith
I think you just didn't read what I said correctly. I never said a Hansel doesn't need sdt, I just said we don't need 11m sdt like most tanks do
With the same mith cast (19 mith) a tank who absorbed hits and wins earned 25 more mith than I. And I had 98 successful actions.
Tanks tend to use their spies to scout. Scout actions don't earn mith. Mith is payable based upon Attack Assas and steal actions. As a hansel you do all those actions right? So work it out for yourself unless you were scouting lol
Actually scouts earn more than assn if i remember correctly assn dont pay any, if im thinking of the right thread. But the action itself goes towards your war contribution
Hansel makes more plunder in eb fewer towers Tank makes more plunder in war and more mith than what a ps/hansel can make in 3-5 wars Tanks are built to make mith and defend hits Hansel/ps make plunder in Ebs Giving tanks more plunder would only make tanks the dominant build just like SH were back then. In wars what you see 2-3 tanks in primal round almost all tanks few sh Indi almost all tanks 2 or so ps a clan Now which seems overrated again???
So i only saw the first 4-5 comments and didnt read through any of the others, so this mightve already been addressed: The ps1 build does exist and anyone who says otherwise is a noob.
Assas is the action that doesnt contribute to earning mith. As a big spy, thats 95% of my actions 90% of the time. I make an average of 8 mith profit every time I win.