Plunder change is needed

Discussion in 'Wars' started by -Atropos-, Apr 4, 2015.

  1. You're a hansel.
     
  2. No one wars for fun. Maybe if u r a dictator you do. Wars cost money and they war to win. One will always win and one will always lose unless they have a cease fire. I'm sure USA wars to win and losing is not an option
     
  3. LOOOOOL did you just ******* compare a tap tap game to in real life wars? There's a HUGE difference smart ass. I play this tap tap game to have fun and socialize. Don't confuse the two worlds.
     
  4. • <---- The Point

    Just in case you missed it,
    This is a GAME and not a WAR
    But it is a war game. But it's a game.
    The game we play should be fun, and when you play a game for fun you invest your time and real life money. But if that game changes and ceases to be fun, the player needs to re-evaluate why he or she plays it. When you realize that the reason the game changed was for developer profit or big spending cry babies, you need to restratigize your complaining technique. game
    So please take a break from the game if you think this is a real war cuz Dabney Coleman ain't here to save you Matthew.
     
  5. Agreed, the mechanics of pots and plunder need to be changed. If defense pots increase plunder, when taken why, why don't attack pots increase the plunder? This would increase more of a reward on successful actions, and would destroy the mechanic of no defense potions, which is quite irritating really.
     
  6. "What's" a PS1? Looks like a Hansel.... Oh wait.....