Please explain..

Discussion in 'Strategy' started by ItsDylan_SoooSurrender, Oct 6, 2012.

  1. Pots, plus the fact that u aren't adding in their allies.
     
  2. Propacks mate he prolly has the fullset.
     
  3. Lol DA I'm having a huge noob moment, true.
     
  4. There are loads of contributing factors when you attack someone. You can't just look at the BTA, there's a lot more to it.
     
  5. Yep way to many factors go into the mechanics of winning your hits against an opponent sounds like your going at it with someone who already has all those bases covered as they said pots equip stats allies all are just a small part of the big picture...and propacks can truly make the difference if your opponent has a higher set then you do also clan bonus and reset equip bonus etc etc etc
     
  6. Damm noob, talk alota crap but don't understand the mechanics if the game...

    [​IMG]
     
  7. OII! I'm the only one allowed to insult Dylan of his noobness. Watch it!
     
  8. Talk crap Where?

    You need to learn to read, bro.
     
  9. Dylan, the game is skewed so smaller builds have advantages 1v1 on bigger builds.

    Pick a target your size or bigger, you have a better payout, bigger impact per hit on the war machine, and you might just get through every now and then.

    I assume of course that you hit with full pots.
     
  10. His problem with failure was that obvious he shouldnt have come to forums about it to look like a fool, while he was sitting in pin attempting to fight out i was sitting full troops :lol: :lol:
     
  11. Shibbi, I had 3/4 troops and was failing like 80% of attacks.
     
  12. Lmao its a pretty noob thread innit
     
  13. Hahaha peace out dylan, good luck
     
  14. Just to clarify, the contributing factors to your real stats depend on:

    -Your real stats NOT BTA(The base stat that all of these work from and the only one you can see)
    -Allies bonus (2%...)
    -Pro Packs
     
  15. Thanks DA

    Shoulda just pm'd you
     
  16. My message cut off 

    But you get the idea
     
  17. Despite all the "variables", there was an adjustment to mechanics. I've messed around with it on accounts where all variables are known.