lIlIlIlIIllIlIlIllIllIlIlIIlIl
Active Member
Okay, let me go ahead and get this part out of the way:
"You're a statless alt."
"You're a noob."
No, and yes. This is not my first account, but it is my only active one (and newest).
Anyway, on to the purpose of this topic; the new chat filter.
There are a LOT of mixed feelings about this. Some totally disagree, some don't care, and some support.
Let's take a moment to view both sides for a moment:
Those who disagree with the system feel that ATA shouldn't censor their "colourful" language, or at least bring the old system back.
Those who support the new changes feel that this is an improvement due to the fact that this IS a 9+ game. There are kids that play. Not only that, but maybe THEY don't appreciate all the negativity that comes from using profanity.
Please, correct me if I am wrong, but that's what I see.
Now, there are also a number of arguments for both sides.
For those who disagree; excessive swearing gives the impression you lack the intelligence to find an "alternative" description of your opinions, feelings, et cetera. Also, you agreed to the ToU when you started playing. This is their property. They reserve the rights to make changes players may disagree with. Should you not approve, you don't have to play.
However, for those who support the new system; if you do not like to read it, don't. We're all different. They choose to express themselves how they see fit, whether you find it appropriate or not. In addition to that, most of the customer base are consenting adults. If they find they dislike the changes, spending may go down, which ATA would not appreciate.
There are arguments to both sides. As it should be, it would be rather unusual if we were to all agree unanimously. However, there is absolutely no reason to get nasty about it or contradict yourselves, regardless of opinion. What does this accomplish other than making you look like a fool?
My proposition: add a mute feature. It works like blocking a player, but it also renders the player unable to view ANY content posted by the "muted" player. What is the problem with this? It seems win-win.
"We could miss part of a conversation."
What do you care if this is someone who you want nothing to do with?
I don't know about you, but this is getting way out of hand. Maybe take this into consideration?
"You're a statless alt."
"You're a noob."
No, and yes. This is not my first account, but it is my only active one (and newest).
Anyway, on to the purpose of this topic; the new chat filter.
There are a LOT of mixed feelings about this. Some totally disagree, some don't care, and some support.
Let's take a moment to view both sides for a moment:
Those who disagree with the system feel that ATA shouldn't censor their "colourful" language, or at least bring the old system back.
Those who support the new changes feel that this is an improvement due to the fact that this IS a 9+ game. There are kids that play. Not only that, but maybe THEY don't appreciate all the negativity that comes from using profanity.
Please, correct me if I am wrong, but that's what I see.
Now, there are also a number of arguments for both sides.
For those who disagree; excessive swearing gives the impression you lack the intelligence to find an "alternative" description of your opinions, feelings, et cetera. Also, you agreed to the ToU when you started playing. This is their property. They reserve the rights to make changes players may disagree with. Should you not approve, you don't have to play.
However, for those who support the new system; if you do not like to read it, don't. We're all different. They choose to express themselves how they see fit, whether you find it appropriate or not. In addition to that, most of the customer base are consenting adults. If they find they dislike the changes, spending may go down, which ATA would not appreciate.
There are arguments to both sides. As it should be, it would be rather unusual if we were to all agree unanimously. However, there is absolutely no reason to get nasty about it or contradict yourselves, regardless of opinion. What does this accomplish other than making you look like a fool?
My proposition: add a mute feature. It works like blocking a player, but it also renders the player unable to view ANY content posted by the "muted" player. What is the problem with this? It seems win-win.
"We could miss part of a conversation."
What do you care if this is someone who you want nothing to do with?
I don't know about you, but this is getting way out of hand. Maybe take this into consideration?
