Paris Bombing/Shooting

A lot of these arguments sound harsh, but that's simply because something HAS to be done.

 

Its an extremely sad time, no one can imagine what the victims went through.

Or could even try to.

Close borders? Send all refugees back? Not sure how that works tbh.

The world is one ****** up place and nobody has the right answer, because there isnt one. Sadly

 

To France an the people of Paris my thoughts are with you all. ♡

 

Yea by some people's logic in this thread we should just sit back play Mr nice guy and continue to cater to these refugees?
Look how Paris was repaid for it.
We stood by, It's America's fault as much as its anyone elses. We need to finally just step on these roaches instead of taking the high road with all this "peace and love" bs. Obviously the only way to respond to these people is violence they made there coffin by these attacks lets be the final nail in it.

 

It's more a lack of security and precautions than it is the refugees, and it's easy to pass all the blame onto America which part of the blame should be with them, but all key nato members share blame for what happened in Paris.

 

Well I do agree with you but we are the ones that armed them during the Russian invasion and we continued to arm them like the idiots we are. It's politicians that created ISIL over oil. Don't want to bring religion into it but last I checked these barbaric people kill their own in public when someone doesn't believe their religion or is Christian. If they do that to their own people imagine the hatred they harbor for us? To them it's basically them or us.
Let's separate the Muslim community find every single one of these extremists an just put a bullet in their head, NO TRIALS no simpathy.

 

Create a new Israel for the refugees.

 

^ (the guy who wanted to shoot every Muslim extremist)

There's nutbags in every religion.

Don't single one religion out. Don't even single the religious out. There's nutbag atheists too.

 

That type of thinking undermines democracy...

A racist soldier could say anybody's an extremist just because they want to kill someone. It would be like Nazi Germany with Muslims instead of Jews.

 

Not sure if this has been posted yet or not, but either way... In a sense it is true.

 

I get a forum ban for using the word "Frenchman," which literally means "a person of French origin," yet some people in this thread are allowed to say they want to "separate the Muslim population and put a bullet in the heads of extremists" and that's ok.

 

@ imitation

You could always report those people to support and they may be dealt with, however the thread will most likely be locked as well.

 

Care to pm me the rest of the sentence that 'frenchman' was a in? 

I doubt it was purely for the descriptive word of a person from France.

 

coz you claim to be a "cunning linguist", maybe they dont want that word ;-)

 

Call them the Baguette people instead then, considering you can't call them Frenchmen

 

Is it tho? Isis blew up the Russian jet two weeks ago according to US and British intelligence. More people died on the jet than in Paris and Both were targeted for standing up to them so that makes no sense

 

I did email support about it and they said it was because I used the word "Frenchmen."

The full sentence was "imagine if just one of those poor Frenchmen that was killed had a concealed handgun."

The post is still up on page 9.

I asked what word to use instead and they still haven't replied. So what are we supposed to call French people, if not Frenchmen?

Here's a link to the definition. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/frenchman

 

 looks like you're gonna get silenced again then 

 

Quran (839) “Wage war on non-Muslims and kill them until they submit and the only religion is Islam."

 

^Religion of peace right there...^^