OSW and the Comanche Indians: A Proposed Reform

Discussion in 'Strategy' started by The_Philosopher, Jan 21, 2013.

Page 3 of 7
  1. Damn.

    My 200K losses will place me at a disadvantage… :lol:
     
    #41 Breakdown, Jan 21, 2013
  2. @ breakdown.

    How the hell did that happen? Former osw?
     
    #42 The_Philosopher, Jan 21, 2013
  3. I like the gold refund idea...
     
    #43 Nathan_WINNING, Jan 21, 2013
  4. Collecting pwar tax
     
    #44 __AnotherNoob__, Jan 21, 2013
  5. Even Swabia and Appleseed don't have that many. Lol
     
    #45 The_Philosopher, Jan 21, 2013
  6. Philosopher:

    Yup, this account was an OSF.

    Then it went attack build.

    Then hansel.

    Then attack build (current).

    Now I'm going hansel again. Hence my growth… I can't decide lol.
     
    #46 Breakdown, Jan 21, 2013
  7. Lol yeah, you wouldn't fair too well in this system barcode.
     
    #47 The_Philosopher, Jan 21, 2013
  8. Sorry breakdown.
     
    #48 The_Philosopher, Jan 21, 2013
  9. Check army of china's losses from protake.
     
    #49 *MachineGun-qad (01), Jan 21, 2013
  10. @ sir Jaffet

    Yeah, I was considering this. However destroying the whole building us more intuitive to actual war. What's an extra 75 b anyway?
     
    #50 The_Philosopher, Jan 21, 2013
  11. Yeah some osf are well into the two millions now.
     
    #51 The_Philosopher, Jan 21, 2013
  12. Hmmm.... Once an osf has 1000 losses they have more gold out from losing a building... :twisted:
     
    #52 Nathan_WINNING, Jan 21, 2013
  13. Instead of destroyed builds, what if there was a way to 'declare' OSW against a clan. That would then set both sides up with a number depending on your clans rank. An LB clan would be something like 300 tril, 50-100 could be 250tril 100-200 could be 150 tril and so on. Then all gold taken from opposing sides brings that number down and first clan to reach 0 wins. Each clan you war gets its own number, for example, if yafi wanted to win against Osiris and aah, it would have to zero both amounts(not sure their ranks). Only players from clans involved take away from final totals.

    Not 100% thought out, just an idea
     
    #53 ______ioOz_____, Jan 21, 2013
  14. @ooz

    I see a bit where you are going with this. Not bad, try to work out the details a little bit.
     
    #54 The_Philosopher, Jan 21, 2013
  15. @Philosopher:

    I luckily have a few non OSF accounts, I could just transform my bank into my main lol.

    But it'd be nice IF gold was refunded…

     so much cash out :lol:
     
    #55 Breakdown, Jan 21, 2013
  16. Ooz, I can't see where pot burns, resets, or runners would fit into it. OSW wouldn't be off-system if it had a system.
     
    #56 Nathan_WINNING, Jan 21, 2013
  17. To say the Comanche accepted the pressence of the whites is a gross mis-statement of fact. Additionally, to classify them as thieves and rapists simply shows that the ignorant racism of white america is strong within you phil. Your history book was written to perpetuate the lies of Americas government and ruling class.
     
    #57 SiCn0c_BaD__MeDiCiNe__________, Jan 21, 2013
  18. If you eliminated the "Dead Horse" strategy, I can think of a couple well known war clans that would be wiped off of KaW within the next week.

    Combine that with your other proposal of making spies more vulnerable and OSW might actually stop being a borefest.

    Too bad you didn't make these threads 1-2 years ago when these problems started ;).
     
    #58 SirIsaacLime, Jan 21, 2013
  19. The only problem is that people could steamroll entire clans before they even had time to react or say that they were being unjustly attacked, thus creating forced OSWs
     
    #59 Zarpar, Jan 21, 2013
  20. Email this to the devs , won't get seen on Forums.
     
    #60 Assasin_for_Hire, Jan 21, 2013
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 3 of 7