On Tower Builds...

Discussion in 'Wars' started by joe_, Dec 24, 2012.

  1. What are you arguing?
     
  2. @ Joe. Did u mean me with that last comment?
     
  3. Mick: there are tons of builds dtw for tons of players, but no dtw/ots in sw.
     
  4. No, Mick, was arguing the one you summarily dismissed.
     
  5. I've been through this x100 and back
     
  6. No Joe the build I speak of is forever dtw. Sw/osw. Testedits a totally infair advantage. And I believe the tower build and it's advantage stem from the same cause. T5. Devs obviously didn't beta all the different aspects of their mechs. They just rushed it out and are relying on us the players to test them and find the exploits. As they always have. I am in complete agreement with you that it is an exploit. It's not the only one either. I feel it is a glitch in the new t5 builds. And I'm not totally sure it is only t5 but the other glitch I mention started the day t5 came out. Didn't happen the day before
     
  7. The one I dismissed? I guess I'm not catching what you are saying bud? I didn't think I dismissed any comment/argument lol
     
  8. And now I feel stupid for realizing you meant dark lol. My bad
     
  9. We're still running in circles?
    My oh my people.

    :lol:
     
  10. First of all support for the removal

    Tower builds only work like CG said if you have lots of BFA, so with that 1m defence you had let's now call 2m making it unless your a big hansel nearly impossible to assassinate KO and definitely not happening for attack builds/Hybrids, if you can hit somebody at full troops and sit pretty while 5~ all have to burn your spies and when they have burnt you can just sit pretty with a full bar and a massive static defence.

    Now onto a different part, I know it's been discussed on the thread this is why the new EE was made to destroy turtle wars, that's correct, everybody was dtw and I can see that happening if we all sit there with Full troops dtw to enemy with no foreseeable way to kill troops then to burn what little spies you have on their nearly unbeatable Static spy defence.

    When people say they are at a plunder disadvantage it annoys me, it takes a lot of BfA as CG said to maintain a Tower build and I doubt the 1T plus has come from wins, so it must take Nobility and Xtal all which is free cash....

    My opinion on tower builds
     
  11. Devs say resetting for xstls is exploiting the system but they don't care about tower builds. They do whatever they want
     
  12. If I recall correctly, that's the same build Cambji has...He was banned because he was always dtw for attacks during his osw

    That being said, that build is a clear exploit in mechanics...Even the devs didn't know about it until they banned him and his clan mates had to explain things
     
  13. We aren't running in circles anarchy u crybaby nOob.


    Basically tho Joe_ what u did by bringing this to the devs attention is exactly what feedback purposes are for. They do not beta test their own work. So they dont know all the bugs/glitches/exploits that come with new updates. They just throw it out to us and let us nitpick it. Then we in turn find the exploits and feedback devs when we find them. I believe one has been found and needed to be brought to the developers attention. I give you kudos for being the one to bring it to forums because you knew the backlash you would get when all the people with tower builds called you an insane butthurt nOob. I however disagree with that and commend you for bringing this debate up. Because it truly is an exploit of the system.

    They nerfed tower builds before for way less of a reason. They made a new system to keep us from Turtle wars. I believe devs will fix this issue soon
     
  14. And it's a myth tower builds require a high BFA. Maybe to hit top 10 LB lol
     
  15. Holy crap...

    Joke Mickey.




    Joke.
    :shock:
     
  16. Also why would they require high bfa? The new 23m attack pot adds 60m to bfa alone. I as a 7m hansel beat 10m attack build on attacks regularly. With less than 4/4/4/4m bfa.

    And u don't need the bfa on def. No one can hit you. The bfa argument just goes out the window here. If u need high bfa then it's to attack LB players. Not to maintain a def. Remember. Untouchable
     
  17. God, that was harsh...
    :shock:

    Still recovering from that outburst.
     
  18. Anarchy don't you have some mith issues to go cry about
     
  19. Yeah Mickey, that's not on my schedule for another 1.5 hours though.

    I'll pm you when I do eh?
    :)
     
  20. Go for it. I'll pm u back on march 1st. Along with everyone else who followed me lol.