Some pure spys have 3m sdt though about the same as a attack towered build so the reduction is about the same. It's optional for either build though you choose to have sdt. If the cost is higher for a ps than a atk towered. Why are the payouts not the same or close to the same? Can anyone answer that for me?
We have to carry the weight of 3 mill adt too double ur plunder loss then talk to me about who's more expensive also double the or triple the pots used as we have to use all 4 pots u use 1.5 some only 1
The pay outs aren't the same for the same reason hax0r mechs got shut down in ee. This game became a sb and ab game. Making yourself up but not able to be hit is.. Just trying for an easy win that has minimal risk.
Not sure why u guys are arguing over build prices what's that got to do with paying out for pots used in assassinations. I have seen attacks builds often ass in EE this change would benefit all just some peeps too selfish to realise it.
It would mostly benifit ps. Everyone else pays out okay. Next you'll want 30 minute wars and double the Mith
I think wat kaw_c was trying to tell u is that ur pots used in assassinates are figured into ur payout just that with only assassinates ur contribution is far less then a complete build using all bars and pots so ur portion of the reward is less
Stephs right, build cost has literally nothing to do with the price of tea in China with mith payouts
Even with pots figured in hybrids and attack builds can befifit all the same. However why dont spy builds get more as we put more time into our spy stats?
So from my understandings u guys want ps to walk into indys as hansels then ? And u won't say a word in cc? Because every time one person has forgot I see them got raged at. Look number 12 LEAK forgot to take down building < and you all know this goes on.
I'm not saying that I'm saying if u strategically enter a war as half a build then u get half the reward is fair
That wasn't aimed at you Was to others moaning making out ps is a exploit. How would they feel if they got thrown into a war with 10 hansels that all ignored wc and just stole whole war incase of win to get mith. Fair mith pay or not you can't and won't stop ps from taking part in any ee wars no matter how much you hate the build.
U can blame that on 1 hour wars steph in 2 hour wars towered hansels were hugely sought out and could easily earn more mith than an attack build ... Problem was the players wanted shorter wars and shorter meant more about plunder then control as totals at the end of wars got cut in half so less was earned by koing someone
Yes penguin imagine how horrid it would be to be an attack build in war with absolutely no spy building .. Even a build with not enough is looked at as a weak link in ee
Station, that is true, but the point why I asked is that a half build such as attack build would generate more mithril at the end of war due to more plunder, just like you said. However, a half build like ps would not get equal reward at the end of war even with more successful actions and plunder from knockouts. This is the point of this thread, I think.
If it didn't use sdp I believe the pay out of mith would be marginally more then a ps but only because as u said plunder and also it's still using adp where as a ps may not use any sdp all war Tho would be an interesting test if someone was willing to try it out