Worse? no. Spy builds do have perks, such as being able to assassinate and get rid of troops and spies, although that is more of a consolation prize for being weak on the attack front and being unable to be LB, needing pots for basic eb's before equipment, and before T5, having shocking plunder. It isnt done by accident.
Troops can only hit troops and be on defense from spies. Spies are completely offensive in the manner that they can hit and zero both spies and troops. Troops can only zero troops . I am aware of towers, mith, pots, bfa, pro packs, and so forth. Getting back to brass tacks the first two sentences this ring true and only further validate my point.
We understand your point op. But instead of trying to change the whole game change your build and playing style. Op have you ever been a hansel? If not then how can you really say which ones better?
I'm atk build with towers and IMO it works perfectly fine in wars. I don't need a third bar. I'm happy just the way I am
You are probably one of the dumbest players I've ever seen. Attack builds can zero a spy using scouts, succeed or failing. They can have incredibly weak spy power and still destroy a spy because scouts dont cause pots to be used.
@atr, cognitive reasoning. I'm obviously being taken as one sided. My build isnt complete or even close I just got my build to where I can do all ebs and make good plunder and get all my lands before I create my end build. Notice my t5 buildings are all lvl 1
Why would you spend your time scouting a 5m spy if you're 300k? Leave that to your clannies and hit someone you can hit
With all that said I still think devs will say what I said. Its easier to change your build and adapt to the game then change the game completely. Anyway that's my opinion. Nice job on coming up with an idea tho.
thanks atr, much appreciated. This also isnt completely war focused. It would expand the game and its capabilities.
Not all are hansel/hybrid and I believe I said that I have an attack build also. I'll post no support with it when I get home lol
Lol ive used every build, hansles are my fav because of sos. This idea would never come because of the momey and time it would take to put it in. Would be easier to add a third set of lands/t6 builds(none of which are needed)
Not to be a complete downer, but also take notice that the ones who always propose these changes are those pesky attack builds. Usually ones that dont actually know the pros and cons of the other build.
Expand the capabilities? No They would be exactly the same as they are now, with the addition of lots of time and money spent by developers for an unnecessary crap update.
I got this idea and made a thread about it, but my idea is that soldiers could attack, not creating a new bar for this. Did kaw make a bar just for assassins? No, they put it with the spies, Half support (things should be adjusted)
hansels are so heavily opposed. t6 builds and lands don't change anything, just make hansels increasingly stronger. I do know pros and cons of these builds. I know quite a bit of all builds. But I repeat so Simply put, troops can not hit spies. Spies can hit troops. There is no balance only compensation for the lack of.