Cause most of you failed, so I wonder? Was it by design? And thou haters dare post, salute me as your Farm King, you infidels... Recognize the 1st Ever Kaw PvP badge holding , pimp slap a soul out yo body, main event assassination penetration Tron
Yes and your 550 speaks volumes of the purpose of that account . Don't except accolades or respect for slapping tiny people about. That's like attacking a kindergarten student and claiming to be a badarse.
Sorry Tron, but battle losses are not indicative of war, they are indicative that you are too stupid to figure out how to win.
Frog, senseless butthurt talk from a worthless amphibious traitor. Do you see my badge? Do even KaW or just frog your dad all day boy?
Frog says some dumb irrelevant crap, not indicative of me not knowing how to win? Lmfao, punk frog girl boy chump, you see this badge punk boy? Yeah, rub your frog slime tears on my chest punk, I won Top 1000 Shard bro! For all your stats, you got polliwog pee. Bow down boy frog sleeping princess wishing some fairy tale chick would kiss your dumb frog self one day and be someone punk frog,
@op I stopped after u said there should be a wait time after u take some shards ... But ya more pvp events would be cool
Although I think Tron is an idiot and I usually agree with Frog, this is the one time I dont. Battle losses arent an indicative of anything but it doesnt show you cant win. Merely shows you actually attack and/or get attacked which says arent a fairy.
The first day when everyone logged in to see a kaw-wide pvp event happening live was the best part So many players have waited so long for an event like this that it being released without notice made it that much more awesome lol. Now that we are past that initial surprise sure notice would be great. An opt in button instead of an opt out button wouldn't work very well since you could wait till the last day or last few hrs of event and xtal away on peeps that pay awesome now because they are full of shards or whatever. Removing players who aren't participating from bl would be very helpful. Sometimes it would take a good 20 mins to find a target that wasn't opted out. Otherwise you just find yourself farming the same targets till events over. Shoot I think it would be cool and I'm sure there's enough player base for this to work out but If there were a spell to cast to give a player a high enough payout in pvp to pay for pots used and still grow while removing the ability to hit Ebs lol I would be down. This event I guess really did show "how players styles of enjoying this game differ. So you are either catered to or waiting patiently in the middle. It's true you can't please everyone all the time . But more pvp features in this game would level out the field I think as far as making more players happy.
Support, because most of what you suggested makes a lot of sense. I especially like the idea of not being able to continuously hit the same player, and I also prefer opt-in instead of opt-out, which would of course need the Battle List to be altered in a way that only those who have opted in appear in it. If you have multiple alts, you would not have to sign up with all of them, which is a bit hard to handle. I also like the idea of the collection metre -- my spy alt was one of the unlucky ones who had a few below 250 in the end even though I had more than that several times. I would like another detail changed in future events: instead of dtw, there should be knockouts in these events like in EE wars. It would not allow people to constantly hit from pin, and it would give the player knocking another one out the chance to win a somewhat higher number of shards (or whatever the items in the next such event would be called). Also, as I have remarked several times, the hit range should be lowered -- there are still too many players taking advantage of their superior stats, picking on those who have no chance at all to hit back and even get a single successful action. BTW: I also liked that a player's name would appear in the newsfeed even on successful spy actions when they were using a blade, but please make it a link next time -- it's really painful to enter barcode names by trial and error.
I agree -- that's why the time window to opt in would have to be set *before* the actual event begins, or at most continuing just during the first 24 hours of it. And the collection metre the OP suggested would prevent taking away last-minute what others already earned anyway.