A fix that ATA can also make is to not make valid actions that do not take out enemy's troops or spies. What I mean by that is that attacking a open ps do not kill enemy troops since a ps has none, so unloading troops on a ps would forfeit a large amount of items pay out. This will also be a benefit for LL war, those scout bombing a target that is already zs won't no longer get full payout of items. They'll now be force to war.
Growing doesn't do much, I've seen it happen in larger brackets as well. ATA just needs to give our harsher punishment
My idea is give ps a troop bar when they sign up for ee. they still cant attk anyone and dtw to attk when 0 golds. they only leak if golds out and all inc attks will damage their troops bar. Once troop bar down to 0, they become dtw again even still golds out.
My idea is give ps a troop bar when they sign up for ee. they still cant attk anyone and dtw to attk when 0 golds. they only leak if golds out and all inc attks will damage their troops bar. Once troop bar down to 0, they become dtw again even still golds out.
It's an interesting idea, but comes along with the problem of that's still a lot of work to make up for that little bit of up time. It also opens up the issue that ps never have to worry about banking, allowing them to plunder way more than they should
They can make plunders without leak but only after they leak their full troop bar already their troop bar can regen and they cant zero their tropp bar by themselves
Like I said, Throw the BAN HAMMER at them honestly, it's obvious their current system doesn't work it keeps happening and will continue to happen I would like to see anyone risk getting banned for two weeks or 3 months because you decided winning a war was more important
No support for ban. If intentionally open, then perhaps they could get a shattered sword regardless of actions. Then again some clans would never win if they couldn't strip a sleeping ps.
Report them,also have everyone in your clan report them. Note: time and date of war and clan names involved in war.(screenshots go a long way) The devs can and will investigate, and can and will enact harsher and harsher punishments for repeated offenses leading to an eventual permanent ban. Keep in mind the devs receive tons of false reports from the butthurts daily so sorting through them can be difficult and time consuming. You may not see an immediate result, but if enough folks complain often enough about a particular user, and their actions can be proven, then ATA will take action. I have witnessed bans for PS throwing wars, they are rare compared to the number of offenses, but they can and do happen
Better yet.. take items away for losing based on actions received/ out going. So many war just to get items and end up costing the war because they suck and go inactive. Say you leak idk 50 in a war take away 3 actions per leak and give 5 actions per defend and success. I.E. I win 50 attacks and defend 30. We win the war but I leaked 4 attacks. 600 items. Now say you leak 300 attacks -450 items. Even if you're zeroed out it'll drop to the negatives. Then when enough people email you'll eventually be given a ss
Just make it a requirement to have at least 1 attack building. That way the gap isnt 70b-20b at 45 mins in.
People who open ps aren't going for event items, they typically have a friend / main account on opp team benefits from them opening so doing that would do nothing. They already get shattered sword from opening up IT DOESNT MATTER TO THEM. They keep doing it, only time it will start mattering to them is when the rest of their accounts are receiving a punishment for their actions until then it will continue to happen and make EE wars unenjoyable to everyone
If they shattered sword doesn't matter, and the items don't matter, then they won't care about being banned either.
Dady says : So PS means Pure spy with 0 attack building, I dont know about moles/alts , but to get rid of them we can just Scout/Assasinate/Steal them, to knock out them and by that they won't be able to mole/leak, I hope I'm right well probably yes!. Anyways GL with Game. And yes Dady would love to have some volley. Thanks , this is all what Dady has to say on it