***** WTF DEVS I HAVE BEEN A GH FOR A LONG TIME AND ITS NOT THAT EASY WTF DO YOU THINK YOUR DOING THIS **** IS STPUID AND I WON'T STOP COMPLAINING TILL IT IS THE SAME WAY IT IS NOW!!!!!!!!!
Well have the changes been made yet? And if so what r they? Don't just leave us in limbo, this affects a lit if your customers, please at least tell us what the total effect is
What a shame, Most gh converted from other builds most didnt start off as gh we did this from devs response to the gh issue saying we must adapt to what works well if not a big attk only option was to go gh so not only did we waste our building our mid size attk build only to have to convert to gh to war now our gh will b worthless and we will end up in worse shape than when we converted to gh. And if devs this will generate more xtl income its a big mistake cause as a gh i spent way more than when i was an attk build, wont see another red cent out of me and all gh should request a refund for time and money wasted
I dont understand all the QQing. You chose to drop build to GH. The problem with GH is not the EE factors. It is for ~1bil you can earn nearly as much as people who spend ~15-200bil+ on the same building on the same land..... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ That is a problem and is what is being fixed. Nothing says GH won't be effective in EE still. There are so many GH's it really wont make a big difference. Just don't expect to make bank in EB's anymore.
Some people spend as much if not more on this game than they do on there car payment just picture your finance comp coming out to your house and taking your weels and tire off your car saying they got to good of traction and if u want to drive again u will need to buy diferent weels and tire...
I support for decrease upper attack from guild to make better condition at war..., but I not support to change plunder cap..., if you change plunder cap from guild lv4..., how come new player could race with existing player who play 1 or 2 years ago? guild is cheaper building and its make a new player could buy it, its hard to earn gold when you at beginning without support some friend to volley you. devs..., I think you make this different to help new player, so why you want to change it now? The problem is GH too powerfull with full enchanted paladin bfe at war..., change it..., decrease upper attack from GH so its will balance with other build at war..., that's I supported. But don't change the plunder cap because it will make a new player so turtle to race with other existing player. Thanks for read devs.
Very poor analogy. A better analogy would be to say my 3 year old Focus has 7/8ths of the value of a new Focus and it costs more than my car did new (you know inflation and all!). That is GREAT for me. MY CAR is worth more!!!! woot woot. It sucks for the person wanting to buy a new Focus because they are paying MORE for their car and are getting a very similar product that I have. Now as a car buyer I can surely try to find a 3 year old Focus. But you know what? I also know there are draw backs, it is older, may be more prone to breaking down, out of warranty etc. Compared to a new one I know I am the only one driving it, has a warranty and etc. Now apply that to KaW: GH-Old build that still makes GREAT money for the amount required to be invested in it. (no warranty) SOS/Vols-Great stats but WAY WAY WAY more expensive and the increased cost may not be worth the stat benefit (warranty). All the Dev's are doing is coming back around and saying: ya know that isn't exactly right that a Guild should make so much plunder per hit compared to the SOS/VOL. Because Stats are good and all, but Plunder is king! We will lower the Plunder value of a Guild rather than increasing the SOS/VOL values relative to the Guild Basic economic theory, increase the amount of money in circulation increase inflation. It is easier to LOWER the Guild's Plunder value than INCREASE the SOS/VOL plunder value. Short term sucks for those that hedge on Guilds as their buildings, or dropped build for guilds. Long term, good for KaW
Kaw DEVS should do what's best for the players and what makes them happy by changing this doesn't make us happy.
The thought crossed my mind that they should just limit the guild to lowlands instead of adjusting the stats. Im not sure how many gh with full highlands there are but it is a strong build. I was did that with this account. My equip made me a beast. Idk if the idea has any merit
@ GALATlANS, you've been active for 355 days with 20k hits. Let's see, that's an average of 56 hits per day.....so, around 2 unloads per day? Math has never been my strong point so feel free to correct me if it's off. It's surprising that devs wouldn't want to listen to someone who has done an average of 2 unloads a day for nearly the last year. And maybe I am wrong, but I didn't see devs saying that they were 'considering' this change. I just saw them saying that they were making it. (One thing that I am pretty decent at is English). Perhaps you might want to be a little more of an eb fairy so that you have more than those 7 lonely allies on your page totaling all of 201b.....Here's the crazy things about ebs, as much as you want to call people eb fairies, they help you grow and are how most people make gold. I personally am relatively lazy and don't have time/inclination to war. But I think it's great for those who have the motivation/time to do so. It's great that you want to war, even if you might not excel at it. It's wonderful to learn the mechanics of different builds. But I personally wouldn't be calling people fairies or noobs until I took a look at my own profile....cause at 176b, what were you? Maybe 3-4m cs when you converted? While time and size aren't the best indicators of experience, they provide some indication. Just saying.