complete bs how they can pull this pish on paying customers is beyond me........ok thats fine but u can ram your xtals n your wars right where the sun dont shine you wont get another penny from me! unless im compensated for tearing down ma12mcs build a few weeks ago
Twined ... They do lock build drops during war ... And its not GH clans. Its GH with MASSIVE leaderboard players. The GHs cs drops clab cs to the point where they match either clans with same build or "balanced" clans who cant hit LB and cant plunder GH. Matching is an automated system. Hand matching would be an impossible task.
What a bunch of bahooie. Take the strategy & spice out of the game. Guess you just knocked the little guys and newer players out of wars. Foolish move imho.
Simple solution to pure spy in ee is buy ally at start and unload on him, at least will give you plunder where GH will not
And for all you nubs complaining about how rubbish it is because you're paying 'customers'....READ TOU!!! You're not a customer. You're using ATA's account, you do not own it. Anddddd no one is making you pay. So shut the hell up
what narrow-minded crap.. Every build has its advantages and disadvantages. There was nothing wrong with guilds - it's the craptastic EE match algorithm that's the problem! But - as usual - devs nerf a build instead of fixing their own errors. Four more years, kaw_admin? At the pace you are alienating customers you'll be lucky to get 18 months. Pathetic .
Look at this from the devs point of view. 1. People hate gh 2. People really hate gh 3. The amount of plunder that stupidly cheap building gets is ridiculous. 4. They are just lowering its plunder, which isn't that big of a deal. Hit some x3 haunt and build sos instead. 5. In the month (currently because of x3 haunt) it takes to build a gh, a player making any other build barely gets to the point where Hoarfrost is unlocked.
Agreed and I think they would have slowly gotten there possibly this next season at least in terms BFE. Look I don't mind fighting GHs. Actually sometimes if you overload a clan with them, the regular guys can get an advantage. To me it was an exploit, but one you could live with. It was also the case that most EE clans had recruited some. They are an additional weapon in an arsenal and clans first got them and then figured out countermeasures. In the last weekend Chaos wars I did we dealt quite easily with the opposition's GHs. I'm cool with that. And there are GH tied to larger clans who will be back up to attack or Hansel builds in no time flat, cause they have Trillions in allies and tons of BBs. As I said I feel bad for those who dropped build to chase equipment and even worse for those who dropped build to help their clan. Don't tell me though that is was a balanced build. 100% legal yes, but 0% fair. my question was always how is it that my 2,600 soldiers can only get 62 of yours?
nooooo ..... Our plunder isn't even that great... So now, we're gonna have no plunder aaand crappy stats.... Thanks devs... :/ way to screw over a few hundreds of people... :'0
No reimbursement for the teardown, no more money out of my pocket. Time to go play candy crush for a bit. This has just become a waste of my time.
Lol @Ashvar You were good until the last line there. You lose 2600 because thats probably a little more than when you hit an eb. A gh loses 62 because (if a coe) they lose 50 per hit on an eb. Simple building numbers
Gh get paid 70mil per hit!! What kind gh is that? I have never make more then 55mil per hit, devs, why you make change base those lies jk
Of course it is except it makes no sense whatsoever in practice. Such a small build when attacked should ko faster - would not that be the logic of a real engagement? That was the root of the GH capacity to exploit the differential in build size: it paid according to it size but it ignored the countervailing strength of the larger builds. And that is the main reason why GH are going the way of the dodo
All I have to say is this. GH's were only 1 tool used in EE, along with Reg Hansel's, Attack, Hybrids, GHT's,so on so forth. Any clan fighting could have any of the these builds, so it is fair. So why is it unfair to have them? IMO Towered Builds can be viewed as unfair as well. Many folks on KaW could not participate in EE wars unless they met Clan requirements for static spy defense and static attack defense. So many had to sit out because if they didn't build the towers, they would not have an opportunity to war, and if they did war in a clan, that didn't demand the tower requirements, they would lose anyways because of the advantages towers bring to war. Maybe pricing of Towers should be lower and plunder loss not so great, to encourage more tower growth. Or just eliminate the advantages Towers bring to war altogether? Or how about let's just stick to everyone having the same type build only to EE war, so people would stop complaining about the other builds?
Naa na naaaa na! Na na naaaaa naaa ! Hey hey hey goooooodbye! Bye gh in EE, how will does gh clans adjust now?
1 T6 tower is a hlbc gh build gh build was just to easy to make and had too many advantages. Devs just want people to put in more work in their build. Not just 50b of buildings
Its not the gh's fault. Sadly,many will be upset over this change. The problem isnt the build,its hit ratio,plunder,etc... The real problem is how it inadvertantly helps to exclude hundreds from doing ee wars. How many see world chat being trolled for mids? I feel for gh's feeling theyre being nerfed. I feel for mid's who have been left out of the opportunity to get eq and mith because theyre not lb/hvy att/gh. I hope these adjustments work out and help balance ee wars to where more can participate and enjoy friendly wars. I think judgement should stay reserved til the jury gets back in...