Kingdoms at War - 03/18/13 Update + POLL

Discussion in 'Past Announcements' started by admin, Mar 19, 2013.

?

Should there be a forfeit option in a 2 hour war?

  1. Yes

    81 vote(s)
    30.1%
  2. No

    188 vote(s)
    69.9%
  1. Re: Kingdoms at War - 03/18/13 Update POLL

    Or just which ones will be occupied by the new equipment?
     
  2. Re: Kingdoms at War - 03/18/13 Update POLL

    5pm PST
    10pm GMT

    For all wars!!  Support!!



    I'm sick of these dam 2am wars.. I've got to do 3 of them this week
     
  3. Re: Kingdoms at War - 03/18/13 Update POLL

    6 hours less sleep and 6 more xstals burned, I hope this equip is good..
     
  4. Re: Kingdoms at War - 03/18/13 Update POLL

    There will be 12 pieces released eventually. We are just spreading it out over the course of 2 seasons.
     
  5. Re: Kingdoms at War - 03/18/13 Update POLL

    ^
     
  6. Re: Kingdoms at War - 03/18/13 Update POLL

    Why not release it all, and you purchase it with a "ticket"

    However many tickets you get is from the level of your whatever its called. Eg lvl 30 = 6.


    If this turns out bad, I'll be rallying for bounty hunter idea again 
     
  7. Re: Kingdoms at War - 03/18/13 Update POLL

    Devs at negative points
    Europe have a viable 16 wars over 8 weeks and your math is top reward is 15 wins
    USA has has 40 wars to try and get the 15 they need. It's not just looking at the negatives it's looking at the maths on the opportunity you provide us with. USA players get more than double the chance. Sorry but that is unfair.
    No two ways about sorry you cannot appreciate you are setting up kaw with a complete and clear divide between opportunities for all players to compete evenly in a tournament that is point based.
    If we choose not to war fair enough. If we are denied the opportunity to compete with some players having double the chance nearly

    [​IMG]
     
  8. Re: Kingdoms at War - 03/18/13 Update POLL

    This game needs more player to player interactions.. We need a market. We are meant to be warriors from the Olden days what olden day doesn't have a market!! Where do we buy our armour! Where do we buy our food!

    Support for a bazaar !
     
  9. Re: Kingdoms at War - 03/18/13 Update POLL

    I'm ok with a few 2 hour wars but completely eliminating 4 hour wars is messed. Old wars 3 and 4 should go back to 4 hour wars. Those were the most attended wars and most ee war clans have done those 2 wars every week. 2 hours and 2 xtals is a ridiculous short war with just chaotic xtalling nonstop. Much less strategy than in 4 hour wars.

    Asking for 2/10 wars to be 4 hour wars seems like a no brainer. People were cool with you introducing 2 hour wars but in 1 week completely eliminating the 4 hour ones is ridiculous.
     
  10. Re: Kingdoms at War - 03/18/13 Update POLL

    Say we only get 3 items, do we get 3 parts randomly selected from the 6 or just 3 preset items?
     
  11. Re: Kingdoms at War - 03/18/13 Update POLL

    I suggest this equipment be centred towards a single stat..

    Say, a sword with 40m/0/0/0 instead of 28m/0m/28m/0
     
  12. Re: Kingdoms at War - 03/18/13 Update POLL

    Zach- that's why I suggested tickets.
    Release all equip costing 1 ticket each, but only allow a possible 6 tickets per season
     
  13. Re: Kingdoms at War - 03/18/13 Update POLL

    Kaw_admin, rather than responding like a professional in a customer service situation, instead acted like a forumer with a beef. Most of my questions weren't answered, but called out in a stick-out-tongue, I'm-right-and-you're-not manner.

    If my employees treated our customers the way ATA treats theirs, they would be fired in a second. If I treated our customers the way kaw_admin just spoke to me, I would be out of a job. It's a game, but we are still customers and deserve to be treated as such, with respect. I receive complaints from unhappy customers as well, all the time. Do I get snarky with them, and call them out publically? No. I address their concerns, I escalate the things that are necessary, and I make sure they are as happy as I can make them. That's business in the real world.

    Rather than actually explaining, you resort to "You are taking what was said out of context" (ok then EXPLAIN it to us), and "It's disheartening to see how some players always try to find the most negative things to say about what we are doing."

    I've said the same thing about the e-mails people receive from you. Rather than being nice to your customers, you have generic form e-mails that are actually RUDE, slinging accusations and demands at the people before even actually reading what their concerns are. I've seen at least a dozen of these, and they are all out of context and outlandish. You want disheartening? Try being a customer who is treated like a criminal by the very company they are customers of.
    (This is off topic from the thread, but I'm on a roll, ok? Back to it...)

    "We do this so larger clans can war as well. If you don't like the 40 minimum, you have more than 60% of the wars catering to smaller sizes. The logic here is flawed, and once again, it sounds like you are just trying to spin everything in a negative manner. How are smaller clans being left out, when really, it is the larger clans, if anything, that should be complaining? "
    So rather than addressing my concern, you point out my "flawed" logic (difference of opinions does not make one "flawed" and one "right"), and tell me to stop complaining. The 40 person wars are scheduled on the ONLY days people with actual jobs can war. Perhaps two sets of wars on those days - 40min and 25min - would be a better solution. Or raise the maximum, and keep working on that matchup system. Any clan can war with 25+ members, even the larger ones. The smaller clans CAN'T war with 40+. Limiting people is not a solution, it just makes it easier. Easier isn't always better. It is a legitimate concern, and I'm not the only one to have raised it.

    If you feel I misinterpreted something, it would be beneficial to explain and not interject personal opinion. I still see nothing about the BFA concern, for example.

    Would you rather us shine rainbows and feed you nonsense that isn't true? Taking it personally is a childish way to react to people expressing genuine concerns. I don't know you, it's not personal. But hey, way to go, kaw_admin! My concerns are definitely laid to rest now!
     
  14. Re: Kingdoms at War - 03/18/13 Update POLL

    Amazing customer service skills kaw_admin. Glad to know when we see you responding we can feel free to share our concerns and get told exactly what YOU think. Way to represent your company. Nice.

    Stay classy, San Diego 
     
  15. I have heard many widespread rumors floating around about a new set of lands dubbed "Sky Lands" as well as the ability to being able to build tier 5 buildings on Low Lands. Is this true? and if so then will there be a set of tier 6 and 7 buildings? One last thing...what about a future update for new spy buildings that are either att or def based like troop buildings?
     
  16. No ff its 2 hours if can't put up a fight for 2 hours don't war!
     
  17. Can we plz have dates when you are talking about next week and this week and preseason week just to clarify. For there is some confusion.
     
  18. Re: Kingdoms at War - 03/18/13 Update POLL

    Support
     
  19. There is no truth to those rumours. Fortunately or Unfortunately. :)