Thanks for taking time to read it never know... If EE is finally perfected, there's your next project lol.
We are trying to get the least number of "No Match" scenarios possible. It has nothing to do with trust, that actually does not make sense. We know players are unhappy to get a no match, so we are doing what we can to minimize it. Would you be happy if 30% if signups didn't get a match? We had about 10-15% and we already had a ton of complaints. The size restrictions is flexible, but we would rather go tighter first, rather than making minute adjustments.
I think the community has been posting rumours about this. Quite frankly, we have not looked into T5 on LL at all.
That's another plus to my idea LMFAO. One less wage to pay, no EE means you can get rid of a few of your customer service guys. Since 90% of complaints sorted
@kaw_admin, you keep adding harder and harder EB's and more equipment yet you fail to help the newer players, there are only 2-3 sets of EB's for lower level players and 4-5 sets for the bigger players, why ignore the new player base? They need things to help them as well, after all they are potential customers
Hmmm.. I'm just hoping this scorpion eb is "the new haunting". 4t plus to BC takes too long with haursz
Spend 20 minutes writing a post and only one line gets posted .... Can't be bothered to write it all again This weeks update and changes are awful
Yea higher level ebs with better plunder would be nice as well, it's ridiculous that bigger ebs pay less than haunt.
Kaw_admin, can you address my concerns about clan stacking? How many complaints were from clans that stacked in order to get lopsided matches last week? I saw a ton of bleating by a couple clans who are comprised predominantly of guild hansels. So 2-3 clans give you a ton of the complaints and it's back to the drawing board yet 90% of clans are satisfied but sadly we forgot to lavish praise on you - oh no wait we did in your forum last week saying great updates etc.... Well I will say this: I will war here or not at all. If we don't get 40 here that are predominantly perms then I think you can count another clan out for war.
I think the devs should consider changing the description of the Estoc Trials in the help section because it can be misleading. The events are only open to clans with more than x and less than y number of participants. If a clan does not meet this, they cannot join. I think they should reword it to saying that they will attempt to match you up because as we all know, there is a no-match system in place. They have both 2h and 4h wars now. This is super self explanatory, Veil of Evasion doesn't exist anymore. It needs to be changed to Wave of Conflict. Also, in the last sentence it mentions "In a future release, we will unlock the Alchemist for all players", yet this has already been done. Just a recommendation devs. People actually do use the help section for info, and it's no help when it isn't updated. EDIT: After reading through the help section some more, I feel like it needs a little more updating on top of that(sorry :? ). I will most likely miss some, but I will list as many as I see. Although this isn't technically wrong, it should say something about the 15 day wait time until the full 60%. I heard there is a microscopic chance of earning crystals from quests, even after completion(Please confirm this, I'm dying to know as I have never had one myself). EDIT: Proven true by myself within an hour of first edit. There is no more war tax, and there is no more plunder/mithril distribution.
So basically Europe has one war and every war suits USA times. That's me out of wars and mith then. Sunday times mid afternoon lets see either kaw or time with kids for war 5 or war 6 in the middle of the night. How does that suit those with families. Weekdays we are eliminated from wars. Saturday is the only decent war now. As stated by pummellor our clan had good matches last week and half our clan approx is Europe based so we are all out of most wars. Doesn't make sense when half our clan is excluded. You just made it harder for us to sign up for wars if not impossible and I'm sure ours is not the only clan. No home clan then you may as well just leave the ee reward on if people war they deserve the reward. Though guess a lot of us can't get that. Tighter clan sizes work but not increasing minimum size that just makes things harder for small clans to run tight teams. Give us credit. We aren't stupid. We can calculate our strengths if you give us the relevant data that match ups are made by. As stated Sunday times are poorly chosen You should get more sign ups if the rewards are greater and you run 2 two hour wars a day. Then maybe you would get more if Europe signing up. But excluding us isn't going to help match ups. Lots prefer last weeks times. Yes alternatives need to be offered as I have asked. Along with others. If we can't war the you will have to give us another option to get mith. Not sure on bounty idea but. It's another option that could work out.
@Kaw_admin with the 2 hours wars you could have done a lot more and create a lot more wars throughout the week. would love some afternoon uk time 2hour wars during the week so that I could war for time to time. limiting mith to EE only just puts pressure on EE schedule to be more varied and with more wars available during the week.
@kaw admin, You seem to already have more complaints BECAUSE if the 40 minimum. People are used to 30 minimum, at least keep that.