Re: Kingdoms at War - 02/04/12 Update Don't match-up clan an with 20 more members than other clan, no matter what is not a good match
Re: Kingdoms at War - 02/04/12 Update Umm nightmare.. You spelt "ur" and it's spelled like so "your". Lmfao.
Re: Kingdoms at War - 02/04/12 Update Thank you devs for another totally useless update...well done!
Re: Kingdoms at War - 02/04/12 Update When you say your releasing the new equipment this Friday... Does that mean THIS Friday? Once again I am believing in the devs... Hope they don't break my heart again
Re: Kingdoms at War - 02/04/12 Update Boo to the limit of no more then sixty for all wars? Clan size is 100 there for already some should have higher limit so everyone in the clan can war
Question: so what happens if a clan ha more then 45 people not veiled? Can they not war altogether or will system only allow the top 45 of unveiled members to war?
Are you fn kidding me? Seriously??? Hello?? You can have 100 people in a clan, but only 60 can war now??? WoW!!!! U just restricted over 1/3 of my clan from being able to war!Like everyone else in my Life u want all or none I guess!! So now in order to accommodate all those that I want to war with me I have to make another clan to war, because all the ppl who want to war in my clan are unable to, thanks to YOUR restrictions. Why is it that we can have 100 members but 1/3 of the members are restricted from wars? THAT IS REALLY DUMB!!! SORRY CLANNIES DEVS SAY YOU CANT WAR!! go to subclan and kick ass! hope we dont get matched! Wtg Devs
Devs your are making an attempt to fix matchups.. BUT clans that are always at 100 members are restricted for war. What your doing is basically saying large clans cannot war as one. The large clans WANT to war. Setup a duel war time where there is no limit to how many can participate and a limited participant for the SAME war times.
Great idea let clans with 100 fight clans with 100, regardless of strength . Letting those clans use numbers as war strategy against clans with less . 60 is a good number to cap at as long as they don't match against 30/40. Keep the numbers within 5 is fair
You don't understand,the devs have a small range of clans with different amounts of members. The “keep them within 5 members." Isn't very possible for the devs. The “Let them war with 100 but don't match them up unfairly." Can't work either,there may be barely any clans with 100 members but not the same strength. These are the reasons why they put the member limit up,to narrow down the ammount of clans/members. They're doing their best to fulfill our wants and keep the game reasonable at the same time.
I had a suggestion last week about helping matchups. Limit the matchups to clans that are within a specified percentage and strength. If a clan can't be matched in both categories then they get a notice saying what the problem is and they don't do war that time. Maybe take the hgl-warlor matchup from Friday as a yardstick. What percent difference was there in overall strength? Devs could track backwards and see how many clans would have been excluded from war if all the clans had to be matched in both strength and numbers.
uhh hey there devs. I hope u realize that a big part of why there aren't many 100 player wars is because so many clans and players are in the zaft/apoc osw.. the war will end and the clans will want to be warring big again I'd wager.. I support the suggestion for a 80-100 option at the same time as the 30-60 wars.. also agree with WarLoR that a clan should not be able to be matched against a clan wherein the difference in players is more than 5.
for all war times there should be a 30-45 bracket. a 45-60 bracket, and a 80-100 bracket. so NOBODY needs to be excluded... and it would be much more fair in all matchups.
I did not mean a 100 vs 100 war to clarify. What I mean is there should be no participant restriction. There just needs to be a war signup bracket for 30-45, 45-60, 60-75, 75-90, 90-100. Devs this makes me furious. All the people who complained that they had unfair matchups.. Ive had a couple "unfair" matchups too but you know what?! WAR ISNT FAIR! IT NEVER SHOULD BE! A loss is a loss, a win is a win. Don't like it? Don't war! Easy as that!
Completely unfair to big clans. There are clans with 100 members there to war and now they can't? Ridiculous. Just match up with numbers included. Problem solved.
To all the people who "think" numbers is better. Ive been in clans where we were outnumbered and still won. Also been in a war; us: 74 i believe vs 52 and LOST. Its all strategy. If you lack that then you will lose. Also helps to have a reliable team for Ex: UBK. They are a very well designed team who cooperate and LISTEN. They don't have random xtal users at the beginning because it is a WASTE. I bet most of the people who complained about "unfair" matchups had invested a lot of mith and their 2 xtals in the war an were just really mad or upset that they lost it all for nothing. Just my 6 cents, but it needs to be brought up to all the noob complainers. Just a RL example: Does iraq go on a forums an post, "This war with the US is unfair". Blah blah blah! HORSE ! War aint fair and never will be. Someone will ALWAYS have an advantage wether it be numbers, strength, or $ spenders