Kingdoms at War - 01/02/13 Update

Discussion in 'Past Events' started by admin, Jan 2, 2013.

  1. Ridiculous times for Aussies 4am Friday 10am Saturday witch is ok then midnight for Sunday some of us gotta work next day 
     
  2. Moose aren't you Not supposed to take sides?? Stay out of this thread. Yes moose it's your choice to do a war it's your choice to change your build from a eb built to war war build. No one in any real life wars go to war naked. No they put on amor gist like tower builds do. This are war builds and strategies follow as such
     
  3. Yea, come to think of it...maybe we should scrap pure spy build mechanics. Eh towers probably should go too. While we're at it let's just scrap the entire game because there are too many advantages to "exploit". May you all war Zaft because doing an EE against the strength monopoly is so "fair".  It's always an excuse and a finger to point when you cant win at war. Funny how you fail to mention that elephant in the room.
     
  4. 1. Who the hell are you to tell me to get off KaW admins thread.

    2. I am a player as well as a moderator, so I am entitled to my opinions

    3. Having a green name doesn't make me a robot.

    As far as strategies go, running pwars was a strategy too, back in the day, but guess what. Pwars are gone because they were exploitive. That's my view on tower builds too. I think they are exploitive. If you wish to differ in your opinion, please do so whilst checking your insults at the door
     
  5. Hax0rs give another build option which means more strategy. I like it.

    I'd like to see the build changed a bit simply to prevent a massive take over of it.

    A hansels with 0 gold is dtw to a hitter even above 20% troops. However another hansel can attack it. If they made hax0rs similar, to where another hax0r could always attack a hax0r, unless ko'd. I think it could solve the problem quite nicely and still leave the option of having yet another build in the game.
     
  6. Open the tower build to other towers and to balanced builds for mine in the bare minimum. Better would be to open them to attack builds.

    Will be interesting to see what the devs will do...
     
  7. You say exploit. I say advantage/pro (it's the same thing). Everyone has something in this game they feel is an unfair advantage and an unfair disadvantage. Moose, I encourage you to play Mario Party 8 on the Wii. There's no strategy and winning is just dumb luck.
     
  8. That's an excellent point on why pwars are gone Moose.. Same should happe to tower builds as the only people I've seen pin one are RedStar and Laoda tag team.

    My suggestion:

    Limit number of top players can be in one clan so difference between the two top clans isn't so much, I've seen this happen a few times
     
  9. Then have tiers. Each player commits to warring and are placed on a team at random (to prevent monopolies) within their weight class. So a tier 2 group might include players rank 150-300. Every build is exposed because their are not a bunch of butthurt noobs throwing themselves on spikes. Or, all of you can stop blaming the devs for mechanics they intentionally built into the game. Like a game of paper, rocks, scissors they all cover each others' weakness. Hence, spy builds can still take out tower build no problem. This on top of the fact you can sweep and catch them on a spy regen. So the only conclusion I draw is you have no spy builds on your team and/or you're too lazy to sweep.
     
  10. I'm not complaining about any builds.. I know both tower and pure spies open right after they KO anyone since they get gold for it.. That's my strategy.. All I ask for is the number of top players to be limited so you can't have your top 10 all from the top 200.. Sort of makes the war uneven
     
  11. Is this a new strategy war build? Yes .Is this a eB whore build? No. Is it beatable? Yes.
    Simple fact is, is that it's a new strategy to wars and only wars. Ppl are freaking out cus it is new and are crying wolf to the devs. Eventually a new strategy will come out and eat this strategy. But it's so new one hasn't come up yet. So let it play out and you will see better kaw players out of us as we find new strategies
     
  12. The tower build IS not unbeatable, it is NOT exploitive anymore than a spy build. Every build is hittable in EE unless KO.

    Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. -Albert Einstein

    If dtw to attack, PUSH ANOTHER BUTTON
     
  13. Lol i knew id see a lot more butthurt here and still no actual viable reasons why the build should stay as is besides "we lose gold on plunder" or "any one can do it" or "a spy can beat it." The last one is the funniest. Yea a spy can beat it down til about half bar or so. Then no matter what they will fail. So if a team has 10 towers the opposing team needs 20 hlbc spies. Because they can't be beat and can only be assn. Hansels lost the dtw to assn with the new EE. We also lost the advantage of you having to scout us 50 plus times to pin spies. Now we lose a lot more with the new sct mech change. Never heard any complaints about those losses. But here you tower builds are, crying because u know your exploit will soon be ripped from you.

    I say you should have been a smarter KaWer and realized that devs NEVER let exploits like this remain in game. Should have been smarter and realized they would take that dtw from you in one form or the other before you wasted so much to try the exploit. So it is yalls fault for jumping on the exploitdont blame those of us that want a fair playing field . Blame your selves for not being smarter.

    And prophet says it best. Open the build for other tower builds like a hansel is open for hansels. Then no one has anything to complain about because the exploit will be patched
     
  14. Satan 
     
  15. Its not unbeatable but it sure does slow things down.
    One of the best part of these wars is that there is no dtw. There shouldnt be any special mechanics that help you get away from that.
    It should be stats vs stats. Not mech vs mech.

    What the devs should do is get rid of the dtw function in the ET's and leave it the same for OS.
     
  16. Tldr version

    Lots of butthurt. Change mech to allow other Tower builds to attack tower builds
     
  17. Ok, all you 'strategic' geniuses out there. I'll make this real simple.

    What would happen if KaW was full of attack builds? Attack hits attack. Done.

    What would happen if KaW was full of spy builds? Spy vs spy. Done.

    What would happen if KaW was full of hansels? Hansel fights hansel. Done.

    What would happen if KaW was full of hybrids? Hybrid fights hybrid. Done.

    What would happen if KaW was full of tower builds? NOTHING!!!

    If/when KaW fills with tower builds (and it will if the exploit remains) we're going to have a whole bunch of very bored 'strategists' on our hands. Well done geniuses.
     
  18. Thumbs up Moose!
     
  19. If you want a fair playing field then lets all have exact same stats no equipment no potions Nd no bfa from Allies. You want fair then that's fair.
    Idiot you just gave yourself your own example of what it would take for as a team to take a clan with towers down. Why don't you be a strategic player and build a war clan to beat this. Lol then watch as ppl once again cry to devs as another exploitation goes on.
    That word "exploitation" is only self opinion. Some call is fair some call it exploitation." That mean you mr cry baby 
     
  20. So keep me up to date , did the tower build get a patch or something ? Thanks !