Gd point from riga I see a slight similarity from the way dev may view those who quit the game as with my chef/boss lol My boss hav the mentality tat those ppl who complain the food is too expensive, they can screw it and not come anymore. We offer quality food and service and best they not come so we free up the tables for all the hi end regulars. Likewise, if a player is so disappointed or down in the game, it's pretty unlikely they will spend further more. Dev are fine with them leaving. Those who are willing to spend to rebuild the kingdom, will spend nonetheless. they still hav the motivation which will keep them going
@sf. A hansel is a exploit build for two reasons. 1. The hansel should lose the majority of its attacks because its attack build is so small. However, the pwar gave it an avenue to win most of its attacks and make huge plunder. This I feel is an exploit. 2. Most builds have to be under 20% troops to be dtw. However a hansel was dtw even though 98% of its troops ( the spies) remained. This I also feel is an exploit.
@snr C'mon, snr. You are a vet. You as we'll as anyone should no that LB ranking has absolutely nothing to do with real power. Personally I fear a HLBC spy much more than a HLBC attack. If a HLBC attacks me, I will go dtw after 20 hits or so. However a HLBC spy can unload 24 xstals on me and I'll never go dtw. Ask anyone whose been stripped a few tril what build he fears more.
1. so bfa, attack pot, items doesnt exit in your kaw world? 2 makes no sense at all hansels have to be below 20% to be dtw outside of ee wars. why mention spys being 98%? so attack builds cant do the same thing?
How about if assassination only kill defender troops if success by the cost of attacker spies, whereas defender spy will stay intact. Otherway if assassination is fail, it will kill only small portion of defender spies. It is needed to make balance to EE war so it will be more attractive, cause mostly to KO someone, we only need to assassinate them. Assasination shouldn't killed both spies and troops, it is just too powerful to instantly KO someone.
@spy I guess I will forgive your noobness. 1. Are you at all familiar with the pwar era? If not, brush up on it and you will understand. In pwars, hansels with small bfa could still hit the osf. They didn't need pots for the most part. 2. Who the heck is talking about EE wars? Heard if an osw or sw before? Think before you post. Ty.
there are pros and cons to every build nobody is perfect.nd as far as peope attacking at night i sleep with my finger on the trigger button and or when i wake up then it's my turn
No support. There are pros and cons of every build. The only thing that limiting spy builds will do is limit osw. Tower builds hav cropped up to combat spy's. Look how much people moaned about them. People are never happy. Personally I enjoy being an attack build. There's no fun in war if you have nothing to lose. I imagine Yafi vs voodoo is going nowhere. I guess the only way for pure spy's to beat pure spy's is to bore each other to death.
Page three, first post By MickeyKnocks. He's saying the truth. Listen to him, and see how this will lead to the downfall of this game.
I've looked at most of your builds.... And honestly you all do not have the stats required to support this thread. I suggest you HCBC T5, before you give your opinions on a thread like this. NO SUPPORT. Malestone7469 Ex-WiG Admin Top 100 LB in Aug 2010 #182 on LB T5 HLBC Participant of 3 ASWs Over 900-days of playing KaW
As a genuine hansel I'd like to see hard evidence on how dominant spy builds are . Certainly I can't refute the advantages ... Then again ... The advantages also make us instant targets But I'd like to see some Stats on frequency and popularity Of the build .For example a question for the Devsf all tier5 Hlbc builds what % are pure spy, what percent are pure hansel ( one attack build) what % are "attack" builds Based on perception only - attack builds are significantly more popular ( I confess my perception may be wrong) . But it would be interesting to see...
@ major My Kaw memory is a little hazy, but 3 years ago spy builds were a rarity, almost non-existent. Perhaps one or two per clan. Then pwars started and it was shown that dot builds could make an obscene amount of money by taking the pwar tax. I think it is safe to say that a huge chunk of the builds, over 30% I'd say ate spy-heavy builds, or at least 10 times what it was 3 years ago.
You are right NCU Major, that majority are in fact attack builds which exploit Hansel n Spy Alts to grow. And as the attack or hybrid grows we grow our Spy Alts as well. And once our Attack/Hybrids are BC. We BC the spy too, to be used to take out our opponents in OSW or other types of war. Or use our Spies or Hansels to grow our clan.