Kaw's Stud

Status
Not open for further replies.
If that were true then you wouldn't use my name in an argument against someone else. By the way, was that really a Freudian slip about your low self esteem earlier?
 
kingdom_of_doom said:
Your inability to understand what you read is why I told you not to insult anyone else's intelligence a while back.

Let me clarify. I'm not saying MY inability to understand what I read. I'm saying YOUR inability to understand what YOU read. Notice the difference in words there? Apply this to the comment about which you are confused.
Click to expand...

I do not lack in any intellectual capacity.

It's just I find it hilarious you'd have to stoop as low as seeking a relationship within KaW.

Did you really have no chance with anyone in real life?

Anyway, you aren't better than me so don't think you can insult my intelligence lmao.
 
"You aren't better than me," is grammatically incorrect. The proper way to say that is, "you aren't better than I." You would know that if you weren't lacking in "intellectual capacity."

I know I'm better than you, because you have to fabricate some scenario you can use to insult me instead of actually having something real.
 
I know I'm better than you, because you have to fabricate some scenario you can use to insult me
Click to expand...

Where did I insult you again?

Edit:Oh btw regarding "You are not better than me or I"

Conventional english

Link
 
I won't be explaining to you the things that you said. What comes out of your mouth and what goes into your mouth are two things with which you should be intimately familiar.
 
kingdom_of_doom said:
I won't be explaining to you the things that you said. What comes out of your mouth and what goes into your mouth are two things with which you should be intimately familiar.
Click to expand...
In other words...

Welp, you caught me.

The only one who is fabricating anything is me, "Kingdom_of_doom".

Edit:no I used google to prove you wrong.

Would you of believed me saying I was correct without an appropriate source?

I doubt you'd take my word for it.
 
No, that just shows you doubt your own ability to convince me of something. You had to seek outside authority because you have none inherently. Your Google link is irrelevant anyway. The person who answered merely stated that you can ignore the rules to not seem pretentious, which is actually antithetical to the effect you were seeking.
 
First questioning my intelligence, sources and now authority?

Are you serious?

The only person who has slung any insult during this conversation is you.

You're so defensive and that's what makes this so entertaining.

You shot down my source because it's unreliable?

"The blog poster didn't want to seem pretentious"

WHERE ARE YOU GETTING THIS FROM?

Smh
 
I can't believe how actually daft you are. Hahaha. It came directly from your "source." I never said insulting someone is bad, I only said that you have no relevant substance with which to insult me. No, I didn't shoot down your source. You just didn't read it to make sure it actually supports your view. A true intellectual reads something, considers what is true, and then forms an opinion based off of that information. Only an idiot has an opinion and then searches for information that supports it. Aka you.
 
kingdom_of_doom said:
I can't believe how actually daft you are. Hahaha. It came directly from your "source."
Click to expand...
Quote where she says SHE doesn't want to seem pretentious, ty.

I never said insulting someone is bad.
Click to expand...
I never implied you did.

I only said that you have no relevant substance with which to insult me.
Click to expand...
Ofc not, since I don't need to insult someone to push a point...

Unlike yourself

Ooooooooo

No, I didn't shoot down your source.
Click to expand...
Yes you did (Ill grab quote)

1.
...Your Google link is irrelevant anyway...
Click to expand...

2.
...understand that a source must be reliable to be taken seriously
Click to expand...

You just didn't read it to make sure it actually supports your view.
Click to expand...
It does support my view.

A true intellectual reads something, considers what is true, and then forms an opinion based off of that information.
Click to expand...

Yawn

Only an idiot has an opinion and then searches for information that supports it. Aka you.
Click to expand...
Again insult. An intellectual can provide an opinion without having to insult the other party. Aka not you.
 
kingdom_of_doom said:
How about you actually read it yourself. Look for the word pretentious and go from there. Don't hurt yourself in the process.
Click to expand...
Again, you have nothing.

I did look for the word pretentious and you are just spouting more fabrications.

You've lost :lol:
 
You just ignore what's true and spin in circles until the other person with whom you are talking gets bored of your facetious style of argument. If that's winning, then you can have it.
 
No, I've won this discussion because you had no response to the following...

Where did I insult you again and quote where she says SHE doesn't want to seem pretentious, ty.

Oh and my responses to your other comments (:
 
Ehhhh you're not gonna get any effort out of me. Like I said before, do it yourself. If you cannot realize it independently, then there's no point in me doing it for you.
 
kingdom_of_doom said:
You just ignore what's true and spin in circles until the other person with whom you are talking gets bored of your facetious style of argument. If that's winning, then you can have it.
Click to expand...
you lost. give up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top