Well, i go back on saying it's a fact, indirectly they may be close & as another person hinted on, the media takes to a terrorist story about a few ppl getting killed in a suicide bombing alot faster than they do to a million ppl losing a paycheck due to a bank hack or another million being spied upon by a corrupt government. If you think about it cyber crime covers a much larger array of crimes & you're more likely to be a victim of cybercrime than terrorism at most times unless you live somwhere like syria i guess.
K Provide source for this claim thanks We've already been through this. And the more capable defences against these individuals/groups become I had this passage about finding an image of a disease modelling but that was childish and insensitive. You don't say Where did I incinuate anything about a price tag? Infact, did you copy and paste this "opinion"? People will utilise advancements that humanity makes. Your negative vocabulary and being a person you refer to other people as "human" seems really technology-hating while remaining anti-human lol. And white hat hackers learn and continue to evolve. You sound like a first-hand victim Ok and how do you know this? So wise, buddha. Compromises need to be achieved to maintain that balance? What balance? Prime example of what? Your original point was that cybercrime was bad, how is KaW related to cybercrime? Or this BALANCE you speak of? LOLWAT Botting (in this aspect) is not cybercrime it's just frowned upon and against ATA'S Terms of Service. However if they were bots used to ddos or harm ATA and its servers in any way... Then it could be considered cybercrime. So wise lmao. Philosophical even though it makes no sense unless you're trying to tie together some big brother watching everyone to your paragraphs? Idek
Where are you getting this? It's so specific. You forget about Paris and Sydney, where terrorists attacked these locations. Look to dismantle my argument you could have stated that terrorism recruitment now spreads online. However a hacker looked into it and found that it was government run and used to gain information. ^And that would be my rebuttal towards that lol
The opening poster gets so easily triggered. He needs to get out and meet some girls or boys or whatever his taste is.
yeah i kno terrorist attacks can happen anywhere but in somewhere like australia you're alot more likely to have someone stealing your credit card details online or get scammed by some fake online company or have sum creep taking pics of your children & putting them up on sum pervert website or see some young kid be the victim of cyber bullying leading to suicide or a load of other crimes you could use a computer for, than to have some dude start terrorizing you directly. & yeah terrorists use cybercrime for funding & recruiting so its a probably a point for both there, so the argument's sorta cancelled out in that part lol
I thought your point was that cybercrime was more severe than terrorism, now you're talking about Australians being more likely to get credit card scammed than being attacked. Again, extremely specific. I've never heard of your final situation occurring. Is cyberbullying even a cybercrime? I think it's a bit of a gray area. "Some dude", you're really downplaying this terrorism stuff. Making a website for recruitment isn't a cybercrime, it's the actions the groups do that are illegal. For funding? Really? How would they possibly fund their terrorism online? Look I don't claim to know everything but you guys seem to know wayyyyyyy more about this than I do and I find that extremely questionable. Also the argument isn't cancelled out, I made that point and you did a poor job connecting the dots.
Yeah it is but not due to credit card freud alone, cyber criminals conduct a larger multitude of actions overall which have a more severe affect when added together than those of a terrorist imo. Well i have, might pay to do abit more reading & talking to research it. Well, harrassment is a crime which is the same as bullying so depends on how the judge goes wit it atm, i have heard of cases of ppl being charged for harassment over cyber acts causing harm to others. & i'm not underplaying it, i believe it's one of the worst crime area's affecting the world but i don't believe it affects ppl more than cybercrime overall. It's illegal here & they fund online via money scams, freud, online trading & seeking out investors from what i've heard. & i don't understand that part being a winning point there, sry, you'll have to explain it for me lol
Kasama I would reply to your assumptions and silly bullet points. But as you clearly seem intent on deriding others and not having a mature discussion I see no point in further discussion with you. As for every point your queried. Use either google or the freedom of information acts. Others sources may not be available to you. When you learn to have a conversation without trying to belittle others. Let someone else that cares know
What I read from this passage was that cybercrime is more severe than terrorism. As far as I'm aware, people do not die from cybercrime. At worst, they can lose money. Money can always be regained. You can't be resurrected lol Therefore, my point is Terrorism is more severe than cybercrime. Buddy, this is where you provide a source for your claim. I'm not doing your research for you. the original question was "Is cyberbullying a cybercrime?" Not is harrassment a crime. You've heard? More he said, she said. Again, I agree with cybercrime being more abundant. I don't agree that it is more damaging. Welp that's your country then. money scams? by freud do you mean FRAUD? online trading? seeking out investors? lolwat so basically telemarketers, scammers in general, shifty business people that offer time share condos, emails from strange 'medicine' companies, nigerian princes, stock traders, craiglist users and finally every business ever are funding terrorism, cybercrime or both. Depending on whether you're trying to link em still.
Ppl def do die from the results of cybercrime, do you think stealing money is just stealing money? you're stealing ppl's ability to eat, their ability to shelter themselves, their ability to call an ambulance by phone, their ability to pay taxes which support infrastructure, education, health & welfare, etc. I could name a few scenario's happening right now but this is prolly the one most affecting ppl atm... Governments are losing billions on billions to illegal, online, non-taxed trading while ppl starve to death & not having sufficient healthcare or welfare. Meanwhile while these governments are not only losing tax dollars, they pay out more money to ug pc hardware & programming, so they can track these online traders & then it's more money again to make arrests & convictions & then more again to gaol them, this is all money that can go to saving & keeping ppl alive elsewhere. That you can't link death to cybercrime, especially through it's economic impact, even indirectly like this circumstance makes me wonder if you're even interested in this subject enough to argue it let alone do some research but anyway... & yeah i meant fraud, sry lol & no, when did i say every instance of those was terrorist/cybercriminal linked? i said terrorists use cybercrime to help fund via certain methods stated. On a last note, i know i should probably source some of this info but it's fairly common knowledge in my country & comes from a multitude of documemtary's, articles & reports i've read & seen over years. There's alot of stuff out there to read & see if u're really interested, rather than basing your opinion off what somebody puts on kaw forums. It's true that some of my sources could of been lying & no, I'm not out verifying all this info in person, but while nobody i know personally has been affected by terrorism other than losing a few tax dollars for their national security & allied support efforts, i know of atleast 30 ppl who have been a victim of cybercrime, adding myself.
I'm pretty sure that if you provide proof of purchases/withdrawals under your account being of another person's doing. Then I think you get the money back or atleast some. Source here Look buddy, you're posting a bunch of stuff but you aren't backing them up AT ALL. Please follow my format at least where you have a source. Governments? Really? I find that hard to believe. Governmental agencies have to keep up to date. WHAT ONLINE TRADERS? AGAIN, NO SOURCE. I do research, you on the other hand have been making empty, faceless points and you expect me to take them at face-value? Nty. When did I say you said "every instance of terrorist was linked?" If anything I would think they'd have support from arms dealers and have people unhappy with "allied countries" to fund their plots. But you made no mention of these once. This stuff is not common knowledge. We are not discussing common subject topics. I am interested and basing my opinion on my own discoveries. A "multitude of documentaries, articles and reports" and you can't link a single one? Lmao And there's the kicker, being a personal victim of cybercrime is horrible. I'm sorry you had to go through such a thing. However there's this occurrance where the victim makes a horrific act that occurs to them, more vicious than it seems. I think this may be the case. Not that I'm saying it would lessen anything that's happened to you. Just being in such a situation can be very traumatic, I suppose.
The problem with these scanners is that the more common they get the more invasive they become, Starts with a fingerprint, then a eye scan, then DNA scan, then it will combine all of them, where it all ends up in some registered database where you need a license to use your fingerprints Either submit to this intrusion in the name of "security" or be disabled or discriminated in some way by losing your ability to operate the technology of the day With all the data collection and selling going on today, it's at the point where governments are going to start fighting over this data because they need to know if they are actually controlling your thoughts, opinions, and actions Govern = control Ment (from mental) = mind
Lol dna scan. Who knows? Maybe the need for privacy will become so bad that the previous methods will become wayyy too vulnerable. Maybe in the future, individuals will leave fingerprint sensitive material on areas that people frequently touch like door handles or bottles/glasses and you'll be able to purchase cameras that will become so advanced that you could take an image of someone and zoom in to an eyeball and 3d replicate it perfectly or make contacts. I don't know, these sound pretty science fictiony but I feel they could happen. But for dna, that'd be the day. I'm pretty sure some businesses already implement a several layer authentication policy. You'd need a license to use fingerprints? Huh? Wat? They aren't controlling much anymore. The main forms of media they did control were... Television, newspapers and radio. With the internet, a heap of information is at everyones fingers. Although there's that policy with ISP's selling your browsing data to whoever pays the most that's still not approved (in America) There's still ways around it, like using a vpn. You have a strange dislike for the government. Govern = control, sure? Ment = 4 letters that are used in several words i.e. Enjoyment, mental, comment