Individual War Feedback

Discussion in 'Past Announcements' started by [ATA]Grant, May 30, 2014.

  1. Waste of time I only join Indy wars because it's usually the bigs on bigs.
     
  2. @spil,not really.only reason I feel sry bcz it is dev's created roster and match up.no stacked clan or some smart arse created roster to get easy match up.
     
  3. I wish it didn't put you in random clans. I like the arena idea better.

    Also I feel like individual wars should be done from your own clan and you just get matched up with a single individual vs you. More like a system 1v1.
     
  4. In other words, I think the name is misleading and the product takes too much time.

    Too many inactives.

    If I am am put in a war along side people I may be in osw with, I will go inactive for spite.


    I fill like individual wars should be 1v1 in an arena like style.

    As for the product at hand, I feel like it should be renamed Roulette Wars, because that is what it is.
     
  5. Didn't think so
     
  6. The match up system they just used isn't as good keep with the old one
     
  7. You can 1v1 anyone you want. Don't need an arena for that...
     
  8. No rewards from last war kaw_community care to explain?
     
  9. Terrible setup tonight. Before when you split up rosters you kept the mids (mostly noobs) by themselves. This war you burdened us with a bunch of people who don't know how to war, use xtals or anything
     
  10. Can u let us out?  getting claustrophobic
     
  11. no support for mixed individual war at all. Please go back to mids vs mids,bigs vs bigs etc
     
  12. That last wAr was awful
     
  13. I did not war during the test war but it looked terribe! I do not like the idea of getting rostered with noobs and be more likely to have inactives. I like being matched with those as much time and effort into the game as me to ensure everyone does a good job doing their part.
     
  14. Yeah the test wars were terrible. Warred 3 accounts so I know first hand.

    Someone IMF got put on one team and 1 lb around 200 on other. How the hell does that work lol.

    There are also lots of mid noobs. It's ok when they're isolated together but don't make me deal with them.

    Match according to stats like in past.
     
  15. 1 problem with it is the person who had the high lb won. I understand the higher you are the harder you are to hit etc, but I don't think that it should be left to only one player to sway a war one way or another. However IMF is a freaking stud and dam good job haha
     
  16. Individual wars are amazing.. It has given me equally balanced rosters till yet.. N this form of wars is very good as u get to know diff ppl with diff strategy n work together to make one good one n then war together.. Warring with unknowns is actually the best test of ur warring skills n teamwork..
    Grt job devs.. More of individual wars with variety will be superb..
    Thanks devs for this brilliant idea u came out with.. 
     
  17. Got to give total support for stations post on page 55 would love to see this done. No set seasons and tiered rewards that you have to work all the way through would be an excellent way to keep the matches more balanced using an individual war system. Those who already have season 3 equip maintain a lead but it doesn't prevent new players chasing extra wars in an effort to close the gap.
     
  18. @plundermax

    I think they try to spectate spies. I'm ps and always war other ps.