[IDEA] New Lands and Buildings

Discussion in 'Ideas + Feature Requests' started by OVF___Guy_Drinkin_A_Beer___OVF, Dec 3, 2014.

  1. No support.
     
  2. Yes.no.maybe.so
     
  3. Sorry just dont sound good but great effort

    No support
     
  4. New lands n buildings r interesting but need much considering n planning. They risk widening the gap from newer builds to LB.
     
  5. If any new lands or buildings are introduced they need to be aimed at helping smaller people grow like something between HL and LL or allowing t5 on LL but only lvl3
     
  6. This all favors the big builds not the smalls no support
     
  7. Better idea, let some casual players have an opportunity to land complete prior to introducing more new lands. I think the current bar (for when new lands are introduced) is too high and that ones the benefit most are active I the LB.

    Say 10-20% of active players HFBC prior to I introducing new lands.
     
  8. No. This entire post is unnecessary.
     
  9. Well if you attended you grammar lessons as well i said about which means something close to the number i said i didn't say it was for sure 1.5 minutes and yes i do suck at math[/quote]

    Not everyone would use all the lands on that particular building, would have others decreasing the amount taken off, personally my favourite is the pvp one :) also in wars is a added bonus
     
  10. it wont change much for small players but will have huge impact on big/lb
     
  11. Let's be realistic here. Knocking 50% of your time off on a regen is ridiculous and it would allow all the big lb players to earn twice as much off hte as before and increase the gap more and more. It was an interesting idea but it would favour the lb players a lot.
     
  12. Good effort and well thought out but I just dont like the idea so... No support
     
  13. I would of left this out, making a point about grammar whilst royally screwing up your own grammar is a bit Idiotic. I had to read it 4 times
     
  14. It's Hoarfrost NOT Horafrost. I have up reading after that - sorry 
     
  15. This belongs in fan fiction. Please move it there.
     
  16. 2.5 mins max is too much. I updated to propose a max of 1m 40s. That is with 25 medic buildings all level 3.
     
  17. What if just saying. The new lands were not intended for HfBC players but rather a "new" player. Like a low lands part 2. Restricted to the same thing as low lands with the same pricing (opens up after LLLC).

    1) addresses the growing stat inflation/gap. An HFBC player would still benefit just not as great as if it was a new HF a or Hln style lands

    2) the lower price will encourage more engagement by new players by stimulating the reward sensation. It will also help them grow to larger CS faster to be able to hit the larger Ebs to earn equipment.

    3) all the ppl crying for new lands get something while all those crying no new lands can LC it fairly fast like an HFBC person.

    4) crazy atupid dumb idea. Towers no longer decrease plunder rather a troop building adds 100 a tower adds 20 to the plunder formulas****

    ****since we are being stupid lets get real stupid!
     
  18. 25% spy increase? Thanks.
     
  19. Support.