I Don't Understand LB ranking System

Hmm thats weird.. might be a glitch... you can always ask the developers at support@athinkingape to check your account, but you should try to give them as much information as possible about your account. 



SuZuMi

 

Too bad no one gave you the real answer.

That's because no one knows...this is a formula known only to the developers.

My theory is:

1. Your build --- Spy ranks higher than
attack just based purely on build alone.
2. Battles --- This is attack wins not defense wins.
3. Allies --- The quality, ie. strength of
Your allies not the value.
4. Value --- Little to no effect on Overall LB ranking.

That's my theory and I'm sticking to it

Merry KAWMAS / Happy Kawnaka /Happy KAWnzaa

 

Too bad my answer makes more sense than yours xD

 

Some sections matter more I think you could email devs or maybe a mod would know which does

 

It's because you have more higher wins with hansel, the difference between rank 6,000 in allies and 3,000 isn't that much also spy wins and pots are taken into account.

Value doesn't matter.

 

However it seems a very low overall for your stats, I'm 6,766 overall and I only have 45 lands.

 

Hiromi it's not your actual ally rank it's how much stats your allies have, as it happens the difference in stats that you need for rank 3,000 and 6,000 isn't that much.

Just keep on buying more allies and getting wins and you will go up in rank, also use your spies because spy wins contribute ( not scouts )

 

Build, allies, battles, and cost all affect your overall ranking. However, no one except the devs know which has the biggest impact.

 

Personally, I don't think battle wins should affect your rank. Sure someone like magesty has hit a lot of osfs in his time, but how does that make him a stronger hitter? I think the ally ranking is the only ranking that reveals your true power, although it is strange your lb should be your lowest stat.
I remember bomanator being in the top ten on the lb before with less than 10000 wins at that time (he still has less than 35,000) so it is very confusing.

 

I agree that battles and cost shouldn't affect your overall ranking but that doesn't change how it works.

 

I like wins counting only cause they take time to accumulate even if you xstal a lot. It slows down the rate at which a person can buy their ranking and let's long time players be rewarded

 

Hey os
The reason Is that spies are just bigger in general In clan rank a hlbc spy no allies is bigger. Weird right?
It's something about how it's harder for a spy build or some crap

 

Valuable ranked 1337?

Whoa

 

I think the win losses is very important is a percentage yours is almost 0 %

 

Here's the issue. The overall LB is determined by more than build, allies, value and troop battles. It is determined by other factors as well, that don't have lbs posted.

The most obvious of these is successful spy actions. If your hitter does not do much spying, he will drop big time on overall lb. I'm assuming ur hansel uses both troops and spies a lot, and this explains his higher overall rank.

 

Kimo, the main reason why ur hansel is higher ranked in Overall LB is ur hire value/rank.

And also kimo's owner is James. Devs loves strawberries....

And NO... i will not hire ur main

 

My overall LB ranking is WAY lower than my other ranks as well. I've never understood it.

 

" I think the ally ranking is the only ranking that reveals your true power, although it is strange your lb should be your lowest stat. I remember bomanator being in the top ten on the lb before with less than 10000 wins at that time (he still has less than 35,000) so it is very confusing." The reason for the low battle record, I really do not like hitting people actually...