I was hansel. Now I'm more hybrid. I prefer hybrid. But I did really enjoy hansel too. So I think it's really down to personal preference. Both builds will rely on ally bonus heavily when HLBC, but all builds do I guess.
The original hansel build was made for attacking osfs and having the ability to drop the attack build in war while asleep. Since t4 is so expensive it doesnt make much sence. Your better off as a pure spy since the small attack builds cant hit large ebs. I was hansel before t4.
In all fairness tho. A hansel can hit the haunting from full troop bar to zero with 10mill in attack pots and comfortably make 20 mill a hit. A well stacked hybrid does not need the investment in pots tho.
100% agree with ipsycho that hybrids are better. But most of what he said about hansels was incorrect. Hybrid is pretty good for EB and great for war.
Who was that guy ? Was it chaos or chaotic he has nice build pretty mixed or hybrid and wonderful for war . Also needs tons of allies to hit other players as neither ATT or SPY are strong