Venom was first KaW player. Hansel did build first and was IG. 1 Attack Building rest spy buildings. Theres no other way to have this build. Having anything else other than this means youre no longer a hansel. No arguments. So anything more than 1 attack building is spy heavy hansel, since theres no defined term. I suppose however Hansel breaker works as a title.
2 attack builds rest spy is still a hansel. Hybrid is closer to 50/50 so you can't lump us togather. That's like saying an attack build with 5 spy buildings is an attack heavy hybrid. Derp
This is my preferred build, since less pots are required to do successful attacks. Less pots used=more money made.
Hash, you really don't know what you're talking about. :| Hansel has been widely defined by users as less than 25% of buildings attack. 25% or more is hybrid.
As long as you have less than 25% attack buildings, you are a hansel. It has evolved from the single attack build. The only thing relevant is how the mechanics work. If you have less than 25% attack buildings, you are indeed considered a hansel by any person cataloging a war roster.
I can hit any eb or attack build up to 4m def and I only have 1 attack build your argument that you need more then 1 attack build to hit hansels easily is a joke
Kozo when a player is lacking equipment they'll need more attack power, or more pots to achieve that. So your situation can't be applied to newer players.
Nothing it's just as good although it's just not specifically a hansel build. It's a heavy spy with two troop buildings
I've held true to hansel with 2attk builds for about 2yrs now. I'm not claiming I created it, there is always someone who does it first or has the idea. But I've found it works for that extra 'oomph' for ur troops hitting other hansels or EBs early to grow. Once I BC I will drop to one attk building again and focus on BfA. But I'm a strong believer in the 2attk build version of hansel.
Me too cynder, it's been about two years for me as well. I've always just kind of stuck to two. just always preferred two instead of one. I've never heard anyone consider me as anything other than a hansel.
Really shrel? Once again. Habsel is 1 attack rest spies. Ive been playing longer then the build has had a name, I was there when the player Hansel "made it" and hit rank 2 overall/ally as a Hansel player. So yes... Im well aware what a hansel is. No ita not under 25% and any player saying otherwise is mistaken. Its 1 attack building. No more and no less.
Hash, maybe you haven't realized, this game has changed in the past 3 years. A hansel is exactly how Brig stated it to be.
Realized? Ive adapted at every turn. But last I checked Hansel build is titled due to its origin player. He didnt have (just less then 25% of his buildingsbbeing troop related) it was one. Thus by definition anything more then 1 troop building ia judged wrongly as a hansel. Fairly certain that in EE and titling the correct term is "possible threat" with the heavy spy stats. If youre gonna call everything a hansel mine as well rename the title.
What the original player had at this point is entirely irrelevant. It is only mechanics that matter. Less than 25% attack builds is indeed a hansel and you're not going to find very many that disagree. Evolution of words and meanings happen frequently not only in the world of kaw, but in real life as well. It's something you should get used to, because words and phrases you use now will not mean the same thing in 5-10 years.