HANSEL AND HYBRID GUIDE

Discussion in 'Strategy' started by XxllSWllxX, Nov 4, 2011.

  1. Cdog what your saying is basically going through the hansel then going into a Hybrid style normally people consider more then one attack build a non-Hansel but ya hybrids are very creative :)
     
  2. I'm going hybrid ATM :)
     
  3. I'm also getting to hybrid.
     
  4. I have 5 T4s and Converting guilds to L2 SoS
     
  5. Copycats... >.> :p


    。 ⚅ ઠآ〤✡ 。
     
  6. DESERVES A STICKY
     
  7. Sorry, But there are many easier ways to become Hansel.
    This is actually one of the slowest ways, as it takes a while to get all those Beastieries.
     
  8. Bob it is a effective way to do so level 2 guilds give less plunder then bestiaries and by the 16 land mark I would hope that they would know what max plunder is.....
     
  9. True that...

    It's not a bad guide. I know an easier way, the way I used. I will not share and ruin the guide though.
    Doesn't deserve a sticky, but I suppose it deserves to be on active topics for a day or two. Just long enough for players to understand what a hansel even is!

    I can tell you right now, though. By doubt it this way, you will lose more plunder per hit than you have the potential to be getting.
     
  10. I would encourage players to become mansels, not Hansels. Being a hansel is fine though, I am one.

    If you don't know what a mansel is, it a Modified hANSEL.
     
  11. Where you have certain buildings and possibly towers mixed with SOS and guilds. Better for epics and quests.
     
  12. Mansel... Rofl. Sounds very... Faggy..


    。 ⚅ ઠآ〤✡ 。
     
  13. Very fruity. :/


    。 ⚅ ઠآ〤✡ 。
     
  14. Fruity O_O

    Sounds pleasurable ;)
     
  15. If you're into that kind of stuff (gay), sure why not...... Just stay away from me. o_O


    。 ⚅ ઠآ〤✡ 。
     
  16. Nice job.

    I would like to add a point though. Hybrids are fantastic builds for EB. 666 would do more damage on the haunting than I would.

    They are NOT very good for war though. Again, using 666 as an example, if I was in a war against him I would be able to attack him from pin and be confident of winning. And he would pay very well because of his spy stats.

    I was a very similar size. You get targeted by the top hitters on the other side because they invariably have to play from pin.
     
  17. Idk if I should be honored or not, lol.
    Anyways, with the introduction of spells combined with pots, I must say that this hween war I participated in I was being hit by the likes of fonzyii and danyjr, hlbc players, etc. And well, they were hitting from pin, and I never lost a single battle. It got to the point to where I must've been there last target. Lol. I even started attacking some of them from pin, and with the use of pots and spells I could easily win against them. The first ~6 hours I had their top 5-6 players pinned with the help of my spies, after that mercs started appearing and ****** everything up. Lol.

    Anyways, it's a good war build, BUT only if you know to use it.


    。 ⚅ ઠآ〤✡ 。
     
  18. Lol. It's nothing personal. It's just the similarity in size to how I was set up made you the best example.

    If you can use it to better effect than I did, kudos to you. But if me and thee were to 1v1 I have no doubt that I would win, and by a wide margin as well.
     
  19. Lemme clear things up, fonzyii was their number 1, he was also the only one I didn't hit at first.. But as the war progressed I kept getting hit by him and mercs that joined and were also hlbc, when I had spells on, I never lost. I'm just tryna say that when I was hit, I could easily defend the attack.

    I admit though, without spells, I was ******.


    。 ⚅ ઠآ〤✡ 。
     
  20. Mansel?? Anyway I'm working on my hybrid build and it's definitely not plunder based.

    I haven't decided on exactly how many more shadows or attack buildings I will add but I think I like the versatility of the build. In the end a good combo of pots, BFA, and the new spells will go a long way.