so it makes more sense to change the plunder in half the buildings in the game than it does to change just the guild? where in that obviously pea sized brain of yours did you pull that crap from?
Wow he's right, if gh I is nerfed then the buildings gh are going into should be more plunder than it,or people will just stay gh! If you do not have 1m ssd or 1m ADt then don't war,gh make tons off your eb build and then you cry lol! Change your build for war, deal with it, or don't war, simple
Well gee lemme see.. guilds came before the other builds so the problem would b in what they developed afterwards duh.. that didnt work the way they wanted it to n 3 yrs later "fix" guilds? Dumb. They claim to fix the problem but all they did was shut up the babies that have been cryin on how effective guilds make a gh.
My point exactly there are plenty of builds that aren't gh but are based on the guilds unique properties who the hell got scared of such a low stat building? The conference is Friday in justhanginout I will tell you how to keep that build alive
Come on, non GH builds lets have your comments on this too. This isn't just a Guilds problem, once implemented it gives the green light to change the plunder take on any build.
This should've been done so long ago. It wasn't the mistake of making Guilds plunder more in the beginning it was how the game dynamic changed adding more lands and new buildings. Most Guild builds knew this was coming for a very very long time. Most warriors have torn down and replaced builds so often it's funny. How many sdt towers were torn down put up, defensive builds vs. attack.. Defensive towers now very popular as well Every single building costs 11x up too 400x as much as a guild Whahhhhhh devs reimburse me for all the real money I spent putting up basically the CHEAPEST relevant building in kaw It's not even 1 unload on a decent EB to put up a guild / this **** is so ridiculous it's hilarious This is like hearing your broke friend complain about the beer in your fridge, you just tell them to shut the F up Even better deluding yourself into trying to make it some grand personal "rights" to the plunder as is!!! I can't even imagine what I'd tell the broke friend if he said this beer violates my right to drink expensive imports from your fridge! I will not let you only stock domestic I am used to drinking your really expensive good beer, no run back to the store and buy it for me
Btw your argument about devs trying to reduce other builds plunder is ridiculous.... Everything they've done since releasing epic battles in the first place is make it easier to earn gold not harder. Pretending to scare people that other builds reduction in plunder is coming doesn't hold water. If you want to fight the slippery slope argument it needs to lead to a disaster, like would you kill 1 person to save 1million, okay how bout 2 or 3 or....
OP, Sorry mate I'm listening to what you are saying and total agree Please read closely One build has advantage in a WAR game :? Everyone who has not got that build is envious : There choice of there builds WHY oh WHY are the game RULES being changed to suit the big big players BECAUSE they SPEND the MOST $$ or ££ or what every money they spend :cry: :cry: :cry: Yes its wrong WRONG WRONG :!: :!: :!: :?: :?: PS I'm NOT a GH
Khaymens... Unless you are a developer, you don't know what is planned for the future. This is the first time that an existing buildings capabilities have been reduced. I agree it's an anomaly that should have been addressed a long time ago. But the devs introduced poorly plundering better stat spy buildings to reduce Hansels growth in the plunder war period. The correct solution is to adjust the bigger spy building plunder take do they make more than a Guild!!! The out dating thinking about plunder wars is now entirely irrelevant, spy buildings should rise in plunder incrementally from Guild to SOS to Vol. However that should not be achieved by taking away the plunder from the new players who only have T1
In my opinion the real exploit of a GH is there ability to make big plunder but pay out none if there was just a change made so that a GH build actually payed out based on there bfe/bfa that is what makes them effective in the first place there wouldn't be any manipulation and no reason to nerf the plunder they make
Hmmm cut off... Or T2. We all benefitted from the plunder that the Guild gives. Why should new players be disadvantaged in their progression in the game over the whole of the existing KAW community ? You can either say .. Idc I'm alright jack ... Or actually show some empathy for your fellow KAWER and get the devs to rethink this money grab idea.
Was it wrong for the NFL to change rookie contracts? Remember when players like Ryan Leaf and Jamarcus Russell got paid more money than Tom Brady and Peyton Manning.... I don't see players coming out of college turning down the chance to play in the NFL because rookie contracts were "nerfed" But according to your logic the proper solution would be to just raise everyone else's salaries
This thread is getting dumb, put it simple if I spend 14b I want it to go further than 1b if I spent 175b I want it to go further than 1b. for starters a while ago it worked now its just a means for big players to build huge alts from anywhere and you got players with GHs who use them to grow there own accounts then sometimes grow that account into a hlbc. Growing speeds up then slows down but the HLBC just can't have that big advantage or else whats the point in releasing t6 t7 if everyone is GH. Like pwars like the haxor build it was a viable strategy until everyone started using and abusing it. The only smart one is the person who actually made it the rest are just cry babies who claim its unfair they now have to spend billions to trillions to get ahead in the game and to war like everyone else.
Yes jsmed , it only needs a fix in the system wars. But devs are taking the opportunity to do a build plunder reduction whilst everyone laughs at Guild Hansels. Well I'm not Nostradamus but this is a precedent being set here and once set no ones build is ever safe again. So make your voice heard, post on threads, email and generally don't let this happen to your build
This isn't marshalls law lmao devs can do whatever they like its there game, and they took the course of action to improve it. They don't need to change anything else :roll:
GH plunder was op, so by extension if you increased SOS/Volary plunder proportionally then Hansel plunder (already good) would be incredibly op. That's why SoS/Vol were not increased.
Woo there just a min, A HFBC Attack build nets about 50% more than a HFBC Spy Build in plunder bonus where is the parity in that it costs the same to build in fact the spy build costs more but you sure as hell don't get the same benefits :? If the dev's want to encourage growth in the game why not improve the plunder bonus of bigger builds NOT reduce the Guild. Just a thought