@battlegrounds - when 3 of you are in forums complaining during the war instead of warring .. Or even if the guy that managed 16 actions hit a little harder , things might have turned out differently . Fight the war instead of crying about the mechanics of a match up
Well the guy with only 16 actions had a family emergency and had to spend the war at the hospital. And the low actions across the board are from failing actions on a much bigger clan. So unless you were here and know what was going on stay out of it. It's non of your business If we have a complaint and would like to know how this cane about. When they say they are making things better. We are spending our money buying xtals in trust that they are and they are not. It's not crying its called costumer complaint. And would greatly appreciate some costumer feed back. We are not asking for free stuff just to be allowed the chance to at least be competitive not a punching bag.
When opponent is way too much stronger, don't hit them. I thought you guys have done a lot of EE already to know that. Anywez, hope that helps.
I'm very close to being done throwing away $ on this war system set up for those select few to succeed. If you're not in a consistent winning clan you're just flushing $ down the toilet to the devs. I don't care about the mith or the EE. I want the rancor & it's BS to put so much into war & walk away losing everything while the devs line their pockets. Grrrr.
It's totally my business , you have matched that clan 4x and that's no mistake . You sit higher on them on the strength lb . So dont cry weak. If you can't win a successful action, fix your build. I make a point no one in a Warlor clan has a weak build. The objective of war is to make the opponent fail and in that warlor succeeded.
Higher on lb makes no difference if only 1 or 2 of our top players in that particular war. They sit 3 places behind us on lb. 24 out of their top 50 in war 13 of ours. If these wars are being matched on strength of those warring that match up should not have happened. That's what we are asking. HOW ARE THESE WARS BEING MATCHED? So we can plan accordingly. It's easy to say everyone else is complaining when you are the one winning all the time due to this system. The rest of us just want a fair shake as well. Not asking for easy matches. Again just asking to be able to be competitive. Sometimes they get it right but recently it's getting worse. Is it based of lb rank or the strength of those in the clan that are warring. A simple ?
@ ^^ Devs said earlier: 1st a group is made on the "warring folks" strengths and then based on bfa they are ranked and matched. If there is considerable difference, then we get a no-match.
That's what they say but has not been the experience. Yesterday we had a stronger line up n got no bully. Which was a fair match based on numbers n participants strength. We just has the better teamwork before that sins always a tough fight same fair match. Today we had a far weaker line up n got a far stronger clan. So I have valid reasons for the question being asked. While your constructive answer is much appreciated the rest are just trying to deflect attention away from the question at hand.
Is anyone looking into the matchup of Phoenix Elite vs Pillars of Choas? We did not seem to have a good matchup at all
Well obviously they wernt much stronger than you, Battlegrounds... Or you wouldn't have matched up. Logic. So can you tell me, with a straight face, that every war you've won there at battlegrounds, has been perfectly even in BFA, strength and clan size. That it was never slightly leaning towards your side. You win some, you lose some. Coming to forums and having a cry isn't exactly the answer. Anarchy.
Mickey. It also helps not to suck. PoC are #1 on the prestige LB, almost undefeated. It wasn't an unfair matchup, they were your strength, your size, just much better than your clan with much better builds. :| Why can't people use a bit of logic?
For the second day in a row, Dragons Elite has been outnumbered by 3 people and lost by a very small margin ($6 bill and $500 mil today!) You can go ahead and give us a matchup where we outnumber the other clan any day now because we're undefeated when we do.
@SR- I completely understand that , I just don't recall any battlegrounds posts when you outnumbered Hellhounds and beat them. Guess it only depends on which side you are sitting on before you claim unfair
I would also like to go on record and say that a 3 person disparity should not happen in these wars. That is 9 additional full bars that one clan has over the other. Even with all fails (which wouldn't happen), that those 9 bars certainly make the difference in an otherwise very close match.
It's not about the numbers and yes we barely beat them that was a great war. That's not the question. The question is about the strength of the participants warring that particular war. I know I'm speaking English I don't know why it's so hard to understand what the actual question is. I myself was 12 on our war roster at 40 in clan. So are you following me so far...good. They were at 21 warring members to their 40 in clan. The math obviously doesn't add up. Throw in 2 guild hansels who couldn't win a hit on anyone plus the 3 already out numbered that =5. Are you still with me...good. So over all clan strength and bfa was way higher than ours. Since I failed atks on all atk builds 20 and up. So there were 15 more people below me who couldn't win atks on 20 of their 30. That's an enormous plunder difference. Ok now that I've broke it down for all those that are not comprehending the actual question and just want to hate monger. In the vain attempts to make themselves look soo much better than everyone else. Which by the way we don't think that. Now can you just be civil and let KAW Admin answer a simple question should they so choose to and stop with the belittling of those who are trying to better their kaw experience.
kaw admin -- much respect to you guys for trying to make matchups fair, you guys are always trying to address players/customers concerns not all matchups will be perfect I'm. 100 percent aware not possibble ! But let me ask -- how are you guys weighing bfa in matchups -- SEEMS TO BE A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WEEK 1 and NOW --- my example my clan ---- we've been matched with -RCA- multiple times , ( NOTE RCA IS ONE OF THE PREMIER EE WAR CLANS THEY ARE ONE HELL OF A GOOD GROUP AND VERY STRATEGIC) but we aren't too shabby our selves, but to be honest no matter what tactic we tried/or do try there is about a 1 percent chance if that, in this matchup based on pure strength -- please enlighten me to how this matchup happens . point 2 we seem to rank 2 in match ranks alot, looking at other clans with near same numbers and a lot of bigger players they rank lower then 2 on match rank --- it's a head scratcher . Much respect to RCA you guys are one of the elite
To all of those crying to see exactly the way the stats of 2 clans that matched, I just have one question for you... What the hell are you going to do with it? It's not like you are going to change anything about it now. You've even said that you warred lower that day. That means that you change your rank around alot anyway, so this information won't serve to do ANYTHING for you. All your doing is complaining to try to make yourselves look better and justify your losses.